On Jan 28, 12:34 pm, wrote:
On Jan 28, 1:48?am, John Smith I wrote:

John Smith I wrote:

My gawd, the man is so crooked he makes my dogs hind legs look straight!Exactly how is he "crooked"?

And just to give a complete pictu

Paul has been a No Code Test advocate for many years. I have
been a Pro Code Test advocate for many years.

funny this is the first I have heard of that

Yet we are both
willing to read each other's postings without personal attacks.

I know some of the folks in the group of moderators. They are
all across the range of opinion on various subjects. I agree with
some and disagree with others.

The big question is this:

To my knowledge, there has never been a moderated amateur
radio newsgroup on Usenet. So this project is something
completely new, progressive and different. We're supposed to
support such things, aren't we?

why?

If someone is really interested in discussing amateur radio issues,
why would they not give the new, progressive and different
newsgroup a chance, without prejudging the result before it
begins?

by having issues with likehood of the result based on testing that
thery

I have seen what sort of discussion paul will and will not permit in
his NG by his own hand

HE wil permit poster to deliberate misquote nad FORBID calling this
deed what it in reply

Perhaps the problem some folks have is that they know they
won't be able to post unsubstantiated claims or ad hominem
attacks - and that just takes out all the fun for them.

Pauls clearly will premit and will NOT premit any response I have the
proof of that by his own hand in my email box

Jim, N2EY