Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Schlecks' Schlock!
wrote:
Paul has been a No Code Test advocate for many years. I have been a Pro Code Test advocate for many years. Yet we are both willing to read each other's postings without personal attacks. All anyone has to do to confirm this is to look up his comments to FCC, and mine. They're all in ECFS. Its my conclusion, years ago, that many posters in this forum are not interested in things like "facts" when those facts contridict their own little perceptions of reality, hatred of amateur extras, hatred of the ARRL, etc. What does that mean, exactly? It sounds a little like a form of ad hominem attack, in which being an Extra somehow disqualifies someone from being objective. I suspect that if the moderators consisted of Len Anderson, Brian Burke, and Mark Morgan, the newsgroup would be perfectly fair and equitable to all viewpoints, right? I'm sure there would be a good balance of postings, including posts from Extra-class operators and ARRL members. *snicker* 73 kh6hz |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Schlecks' Schlock! | Policy | |||
Schlecks' Schlock! | General | |||
Schlecks' Schlock! | Antenna | |||
Schlecks' Schlock! | Boatanchors | |||
Schlecks' Schlock! | Homebrew |