Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On 6 Feb 2007 09:01:57 -0800, "KØHB" wrote: On Feb 5, 8:53 pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote: A citizen operating outside the bounds of US policy might be construed as violating US neutrality laws. Maybe or maybe not. In either case, FCC has no jurisdiction to prosecute "neutrality laws". indeed if Mr Wlf has eveidence the FBI would seem to be a better venture than the FCC OTOH I suspect he is crying wolf No, I merely intended to open a discussion on topic within the ng topic(radio.policy). You on ther hand tend to post off-topic most of the time. I am sure my position is correct and I see very little discourse on the other side that is actually well thought out. It seems like you and K0HB are saying "You are wrong because it doesn't affect the FCC"...FCC and FBI are enforcement arms of the federal government. It makes no difference who does the actual enforcing. The FBI could take actiom against obscenity being transmitted over the radio spectrum but so could the FCC. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1400 Â June 11, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1398 Â May 28, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1398 Â May 28, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1398  May 28, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1353 – July 18, 2003 | Policy |