|
Let the Lying Begin, was: Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 18, 1:28 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote: Who was harmed by the assignment of those vanity callsigns? For the record, none of the club callsigns I have ever trusteed for have been "vanity" callsigns. 73 kh6hz QRZ.COM disagrees. Is the following callsign sequentially issued? WE1RD Lookups: 434 MICHAEL P DEIGNAN REPEATER ASSOCIATION 39 SUTTON ST APT 1 PROVIDENCE RI 02903 |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
wrote:
You must have missed the part where this is about the use of Jeffrey Hermann's PO Box on Hawaii. And poor Brian still cant post a single reference to a postal regulation which stipulates a PO Box cannot be used by multiple people. Poor, Poor, Brian. |
Let the Lying Begin, was: Residence vs. Mailing Address
wrote:
KH6HZ For the record, none of the club callsigns I have ever KH6HZ trusteed for have been "vanity" callsigns. QRZ.COM disagrees. Is the following callsign sequentially issued? WE1RD Lookups: 434 I am not the trustee of that callsign. My quoted statement above is 100% accurate to this day. None of the club callsigns ever issued to me by the FCC have been vanity callsigns. Try to fabricate a more believable post next time. |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
"KH6HZ" wrote in message ... wrote: You must have missed the part where this is about the use of Jeffrey Hermann's PO Box on Hawaii. And poor Brian still cant post a single reference to a postal regulation which stipulates a PO Box cannot be used by multiple people. Poor, Poor, Brian. They don't care about facts. All they linger on are the accusations. |
License Numbers
On Feb 18, 2:07�pm, "Dee Flint" wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... [snip] QUOTE * * Also, there are no non-code-tested Amateur Extras * * at all. Not yet, anyway. That situation will soon * * change - just watch the thread "ARS License * * Numbers" for updates. Perhaps I will update the * * numbers there more frequently than twice-per- * * calendar-month. Perhaps not. UNQUOTE I, particularly, would find it very interesting to see these numbers more frequently for about the first two months or so. I'll see what I can do, Dee. The first possible test sessions under the new rules will be February 23rd. That first rush of upgrades will probably show up in the FCC database within a week and the balance of those in less than two weeks. *I would expect the big rush of upgrades to pretty much be done in two to three months. * All of that sounds very reasonable, but it's still a bunch of very educated guesses. The 2000 changes brought a flood of upgrades, but not a lot of new hams. But that was almost seven years ago. We will soon know for sure what the effects of the Feb 23 2007 changes will be. I wonder how many will stop at General and how many will go on to Extra. Since the written testing is not changing, the future General-vs-Extra distribution may likely be about the same as it is now. My team is conducting a test session on February 23rd here in our area. That's excellent. My hat is off to your team, Dee. *So far, while the pre-registrations are up slightly, there's been no massive rush (so far). One data point - so far. I wonder what the overall picture is like? Or how it will play out over the next several months? We will soon see the exact numbers. Please post the "ARS License Numbers" as of the 22nd for the baseline for the pool. I'll try to do that. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 18, 1:28?pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote: Who was harmed by the assignment of those vanity callsigns? For the record, none of the club callsigns I have ever trusteed for have been "vanity" callsigns. Ooops - looks like I was mistaken about the vanity aspect. If they were not vanity callsigns, then they were all sequentially issued, right? I will reword my questions, then: Who was harmed by the assignment of those sequentially-issued club callsigns? If someone was harmed by the assignment of those sequentially-issued club callsigns, how were they harmed? Have any of those callsigns been reissued, either sequentially or through the vanity system? 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Another Morgasm
wrote in message ... On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 20:02:55 -0500, "Paul W. Schlock" MM@beerenemasrule wrote: They don't care about facts. All they linger on are the accusations. funny statement from someone lying and claiming to be someone he is not Not funny. True. |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
wrote:
Ooops - looks like I was mistaken about the vanity aspect. No problem. Sometimes it is difficult to keep the "facts" separated from all the "fabrication" Brian likes to dream up. If they were not vanity callsigns, then they were all sequentially issued, right? That is correct. Have any of those callsigns been reissued, either sequentially or through the vanity system? Not that I'm aware of. But then, I haven't checked either. |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 18, 8:38 pm, wrote:
On Feb 18, 1:28?pm, "KH6HZ" wrote: wrote: Who was harmed by the assignment of those vanity callsigns? For the record, none of the club callsigns I have ever trusteed for have been "vanity" callsigns. Ooops - looks like I was mistaken about the vanity aspect. If they were not vanity callsigns, then they were all sequentially issued, right? Yes, nine (9) sequentially issued for Hawaii. Here's a query that I ran in 1998 or 1999. Note the PO Box #... no wonder Jeff was working hard to disassociate himself from the guy that hijacked his PO Box. ---------- Callsign lookup results for: CALL "" NAME "DEIGNAN" CITY "" STATE "" ZIP "" LIMIT "0100" Program v1.3 - 8 March 1997 -- Last database update 1998-08-02 11:02 KH6HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P LIC ISU 4- DEC-1997 ADVANCED 136 NELSON ST LIC EXP 14- OCT-2007 PROVIDENCE RI 02908 LST UPD 4- DEC-1997 WH6DDR WAIKIKI WIRELESS ASSOCIATION LIC ISU 6- MAR-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 6- MAR-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 6- MAR-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDQ MANANA ISLAND IOTA GROUP LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDP RF COMMANDOS HAWAII CHAPTER LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDN PACIFIC ISLE DX SOCIETY LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDO KAMAAINA KILOWATT CLUB LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDM GREATER HONOLULU QRP SOCIETY LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830-0282 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE KB1CCE RF COMMANDOS RHODE ISLAND CHAPTER LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB 136 NELSON ST LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 PROVIDENCE RI 02908 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DCY CLOSED REPEATER COORDINATION SOCIETY LIC ISU 8- JAN-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 8- JAN-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830-0282 LST UPD 8- JAN-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DCX MICHAEL P DEIGNAN AMATEUR RADIO ASSOCIATLIC ISU 7- JAN-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 7- JAN-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830-0282 LST UPD 7- JAN-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE KB1AYF DEIGNAN, DIANE P LIC ISU 26- OCT-1993 TECH PLUS 136 NELSON ST LIC EXP 26- OCT-2003 PROVIDENCE RI 02908 LST UPD 24- FEB-1996 Since the above does not, for some strange reason, give a return for KD6HZ in its own right, everyone may be wondering who KD6HZ is. So I searched. The database said the call has been changed to KH6HZ. And who is KH6HZ? Well, none other than: HamCallTM Query Results: KH6HZ Michael P. Deignan 136 Nelson St Providence, RI 02908 License Class: Advanced ------------------ I will reword my questions, then: Why? Deignan has been busted, and your support of him is noted. 1) KD1HZ, 2) KD6HZ, 3) KH6HZ (Sequential??? Highly UNLIKLEY) 4) WH6DDR, 5) WH6DDQ, 6) WH6DDP, 7) WH6DDM, 8) WH6DDN, 9) WH6DDO, 10) WH6DCX, 11) WH6DCY, 12) KB1CCE, 13) WE1RD MICHAEL P DEIGNAN REPEATER ASSOCIATION |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 18, 8:02 pm, "Paul W. Schlock" MM@beerenemasrule wrote:
"KH6HZ" wrote in message ... wrote: You must have missed the part where this is about the use of Jeffrey Hermann's PO Box on Hawaii. And poor Brian still cant post a single reference to a postal regulation which stipulates a PO Box cannot be used by multiple people. Poor, Poor, Brian. They don't care about facts. All they linger on are the accusations. KH6HZ MICHAEL P DEIGNAN 706 S. Rodney French Blvd New Bedford MA 02744 WE1RD Lookups: 434 MICHAEL P DEIGNAN REPEATER ASSOCIATION 39 SUTTON ST APT 1 PROVIDENCE RI 02903 Callsign: KB1CCE Class: Club Codes: HAB USA Name: RF COMMANDOS RHODE ISLAND CHAPTER Addr1: 156 Gazza Road Addr2: Chepachet, RI 02814 Country: USA Effective: 30 May 2000 Expires: 20 Feb 2007 Online Renewals... FCC: ULS Listing Trustee: KH6HZ, MICHAEL P DEIGNAN ---------------- To freshen everyone's memory, here is a current search of the name, "Deignan:" __________________________________________________ _______________________ Callsign lookup results for: CALL "" NAME "DEIGNAN" CITY "" STATE "" ZIP "" LIMIT "0100" Program v1.3 - 8 March 1997 -- Last database update 1998-08-02 11:02 KH6HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P LIC ISU 4- DEC-1997 ADVANCED 136 NELSON ST LIC EXP 14- OCT-2007 PROVIDENCE RI 02908 LST UPD 4- DEC-1997 WH6DDR WAIKIKI WIRELESS ASSOCIATION LIC ISU 6- MAR-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 6- MAR-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 6- MAR-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDQ MANANA ISLAND IOTA GROUP LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDP RF COMMANDOS HAWAII CHAPTER LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDN PACIFIC ISLE DX SOCIETY LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDO KAMAAINA KILOWATT CLUB LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDM GREATER HONOLULU QRP SOCIETY LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830-0282 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE KB1CCE RF COMMANDOS RHODE ISLAND CHAPTER LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB 136 NELSON ST LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 PROVIDENCE RI 02908 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DCY CLOSED REPEATER COORDINATION SOCIETY LIC ISU 8- JAN-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 8- JAN-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830-0282 LST UPD 8- JAN-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DCX MICHAEL P DEIGNAN AMATEUR RADIO ASSOCIATLIC ISU 7- JAN-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 7- JAN-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830-0282 LST UPD 7- JAN-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE KB1AYF DEIGNAN, DIANE P LIC ISU 26- OCT-1993 TECH PLUS 136 NELSON ST LIC EXP 26- OCT-2003 PROVIDENCE RI 02908 LST UPD 24- FEB-1996 Since the above does not, for some strange reason, give a return for KD6HZ in its own right, everyone may be wondering who KD6HZ is. So I searched. The database said the call has been changed to KH6HZ. And who is KH6HZ? Well, none other than: HamCallTM Query Results: KH6HZ Click for map Country Info Michael P. Deignan 136 Nelson St Providence, RI 02908 License Class: Advanced |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
wrote:
1) KD1HZ, 2) KD6HZ, 3) KH6HZ (Sequential??? Highly UNLIKLEY) Who is KD6HZ? Never heard of him (or her). Did I alledgedly have this callsign while travelling overseas on my Ocean-Going Trawler based out of Washington State? 13) WE1RD MICHAEL P DEIGNAN REPEATER ASSOCIATION Bzzzzt. Wrong again. Not the trustee of this one either. |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 18, 12:34 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote: Then you're either Jeffrey Hermann, Jeffrey Hermann's relation, or Jeffrey Hermann's employee. There is no regulation which states I have to be an employee or relation -- even today. Might want to brush up on the postal regulations. I was using your excuses above as to how you've loaned out your own PO Box. Why did you provide them if they are irrelevant? That you're a fraud on numerous accounts doesn't mean that fraudulently using Jeff's PO Box was OK. |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 18, 1:49 pm, "Dee Flint" wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... [snip] I'm rarely surprised when an amateur behaving badly turns out to be a 20WPM Tested Extra. This is the same type of stereotyping as saying that no-code Techs are CB hams. This stereotyping has no validity. Or that 5WPM Technicians can't be DXers (Heil). Just as an FYI, one of the worst jammers on the west coast was a Technician. He may have been an Extra at heart. These behaviours have nothing to do with one's license class and everything to do with the individual's already existing personality. Dee, N8UZE Dee, can I use your mailing address for FCC purposes? |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 18, 1:49 pm, "Dee Flint" wrote: wrote in message ups.com... [snip] I'm rarely surprised when an amateur behaving badly turns out to be a 20WPM Tested Extra. This is the same type of stereotyping as saying that no-code Techs are CB hams. This stereotyping has no validity. Or that 5WPM Technicians can't be DXers (Heil). Just as an FYI, one of the worst jammers on the west coast was a Technician. He may have been an Extra at heart. These behaviours have nothing to do with one's license class and everything to do with the individual's already existing personality. Dee, N8UZE Dee, can I use your mailing address for FCC purposes? Nope wouldn't let anyone (except my "gypsy" daughter) pick up mail here so it would not be valid for FCC purposes. Dee, N8UZE |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
|
Residence vs. Mailing Address
From: "Dee Flint" on Sun, Feb 18 2007 1:49 pm
wrote in message [snip] I'm rarely surprised when an amateur behaving badly turns out to be a 20WPM Tested Extra. This is the same type of stereotyping as saying that no-code Techs are CB hams. This stereotyping has no validity. Just as an FYI, one of the worst jammers on the west coast was a Technician. One of the greatest gobblers of call signs on the west coast is very definitely a long-time (therefore 20 WPM tested) extra, Roy Tucker, N6TK. Up to 1 Jan 2001 he had no less than FORTY-ONE callsigns! He still has NINETEEN of them, all at the same Whiterock Drive, La Mirada, CA location. Search for the history of the "W6NUT" repeater, always on 147.435 MHz. It has since gone through two ownership changes but Tucker is on that repeater regularly. You can also find it on the ARRL letter and the regular ham disobediance notices there. :-) You could begin at www.435.org for a start. Mikey D, take note, there's still hope for you gobbling up more than 19 calls and be "on top." :-) These behaviours have nothing to do with one's license class and everything to do with the individual's already existing personality. Yes, we've all seen that with Heil, Miccolis, Kelly, and, once in a while, Flint. Note the slip in your first paragraph of denigrating Technician class as "worst jammer." Not to mention pointing out "west coast." Tsk, tsk. "Six land" (meaning primarily California) already has an over-abundance of amateur radio licensees. I doubt that you care very much about that since few non-residents want to gobble up calls from YOUR call area. Oh, and is "behaviour" anything similar to "endeavour?" Does it have a "colour?" A "flavour?" :-) LA |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
I'm rarely surprised when an amateur behaving badly turns out to be a 20WPM Tested Extra. This is the same type of stereotyping as saying that no-code Techs are CB hams. This stereotyping has no validity. Or that 5WPM Technicians can't be DXers (Heil). Just as an FYI, one of the worst jammers on the west coast was a Technician. He may have been an Extra at heart. These behaviours have nothing to do with one's license class and everything to do with the individual's already existing personality. Dee, N8UZE Dee, can I use your mailing address for FCC purposes? Nope wouldn't let anyone (except my "gypsy" daughter) pick up mail here so it would not be valid for FCC purposes. Dee, N8UZE Really? Well, perhaps I could "loan out" my mailing address. (Grin) But of course I am "only" a 13wpm tested General and don't meet the criteria of a Malcontent Extra as defined by others. Maybe I should upgrade so as to be promoted to that category? Of course, becoming a 13wpm Extra may open me up for derision by some who earned it the old way.... |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
wrote in message ps.com... From: "Dee Flint" on Sun, Feb 18 2007 1:49 pm wrote in message [snip] I'm rarely surprised when an amateur behaving badly turns out to be a 20WPM Tested Extra. This is the same type of stereotyping as saying that no-code Techs are CB hams. This stereotyping has no validity. Just as an FYI, one of the worst jammers on the west coast was a Technician. One of the greatest gobblers of call signs on the west coast is very definitely a long-time (therefore 20 WPM tested) extra, Roy Tucker, N6TK. Up to 1 Jan 2001 he had no less than FORTY-ONE callsigns! He still has NINETEEN of them, all at the same Whiterock Drive, La Mirada, CA location. Search for the history of the "W6NUT" repeater, always on 147.435 MHz. It has since gone through two ownership changes but Tucker is on that repeater regularly. You can also find it on the ARRL letter and the regular ham disobediance notices there. :-) You could begin at www.435.org for a start. Mikey D, take note, there's still hope for you gobbling up more than 19 calls and be "on top." :-) These behaviours have nothing to do with one's license class and everything to do with the individual's already existing personality. Yes, we've all seen that with Heil, Miccolis, Kelly, and, once in a while, Flint. Note the slip in your first paragraph of denigrating Technician class as "worst jammer." Not to mention pointing out "west coast." Tsk, tsk. "Six land" (meaning primarily California) already has an over-abundance of amateur radio licensees. I doubt that you care very much about that since few non-residents want to gobble up calls from YOUR call area. Oh, and is "behaviour" anything similar to "endeavour?" Does it have a "colour?" A "flavour?" :-) LA Flatus by any other name....well, you take if from here, Len. |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 18, 8:47?pm, "Paul W. Schlock" MM@beerenemasrule wrote:
But of course I am "only" a 13wpm tested General and don't meet the criteria of a Malcontent Extra as defined by others. You don't exist, "Schlock." You aren't in any position to do anything but mouth off with a cutesy anony-mousie handle. Of course, becoming a 13wpm Extra may open me up for derision by some who earned it the old way You've already opened yourself for derision. shrug |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 18, 8:58�pm, "Paul W. Schlock" MM@beerenemasrule wrote:
wrote in message ps.com... From: "Dee Flint" on Sun, Feb 18 2007 1:49 pm wrote in message [snip] I'm rarely surprised when an amateur behaving badly turns out to be a 20WPM Tested Extra. This is the same type of stereotyping as saying that no-code Techs are CB hams. *This stereotyping has no validity. Just as an FYI, one of the worst jammers on the west coast was a Technician. * *One of the greatest gobblers of call signs on the west coast * *is very definitely a long-time (therefore 20 WPM tested) extra, * *Roy Tucker, N6TK. *Up to 1 Jan 2001 he had no less than * *FORTY-ONE callsigns! *He still has NINETEEN of them, all * *at the same Whiterock Drive, La Mirada, CA location. * *Search for the history of the "W6NUT" repeater, always on * *147.435 MHz. *It has since gone through two ownership * *changes but Tucker is on that repeater regularly. *You can * *also find it on the ARRL letter and the regular ham * *disobediance notices there. *:-) * *You could begin atwww.435.orgfor a start. * *Mikey D, take note, there's still hope for you gobbling * *up more than 19 calls and be "on top." *:-) These behaviours have nothing to do with one's license class and everything to do with the individual's already existing personality. * *Yes, we've all seen that with Heil, Miccolis, Kelly, and, * *once in a while, Flint. *Note the slip in your first * *paragraph of denigrating Technician class as "worst jammer." * *Not to mention pointing out "west coast." *Tsk, tsk. * *"Six land" (meaning primarily California) already has an * *over-abundance of amateur radio licensees. *I doubt that * *you care very much about that since few non-residents want * *to gobble up calls from YOUR call area. * *Oh, and is "behaviour" anything similar to "endeavour?" * *Does it have a "colour?" *A "flavour?" *:-) * *LA Flatus by any other name....well, you take if from here, Len. I can't help anony-mousies who have gas problems. Go see your doctor for that...the witch, that is... |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 18, 8:47?pm, "Paul W. Schlock" MM@beerenemasrule wrote: But of course I am "only" a 13wpm tested General and don't meet the criteria of a Malcontent Extra as defined by others. You don't exist, "Schlock." You aren't in any position to do anything but mouth off with a cutesy anony-mousie handle. Of course, becoming a 13wpm Extra may open me up for derision by some who earned it the old way You've already opened yourself for derision. shrug As have you, Oh Gaseous One. And, Len? It must come as no surprise that I consider you to be of no more importance than the latest Michael Jackson updates. spit |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
"Six land" (meaning primarily California) already has an over-abundance of amateur radio licensees. I doubt that you care very much about that since few non-residents want to gobble up calls from YOUR call area. Oh, and is "behaviour" anything similar to "endeavour?" Does it have a "colour?" A "flavour?" :-) LA Flatus by any other name....well, you take if from here, Len. I can't help anony-mousies who have gas problems. Go see your doctor for that...the witch, that is... You disappoint me, Len. Surely you are capable of something more verbose and a bit less childish. You know the drill. If you can't impress us with a few words of wit, then author a multi-paragraphed, 17kb response ad-nauseum. Come on, Len. Dazzle us with yet another display of no-holds-barred and unfettered flatus. You da Man! |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
wrote in message ... On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 21:49:33 -0500, "KH6HZ" wrote: wrote: 1) KD1HZ, 2) KD6HZ, 3) KH6HZ (Sequential??? Highly UNLIKLEY) Who is KD6HZ? Never heard of him (or her). Did I alledgedly have this callsign while travelling overseas on my Ocean-Going Trawler based out of Washington State? why not just come clean and move on everyone makes mistakes Yes, even Gav admits to that... |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
behaving badly turns out to be a 20WPM Tested Extra. This is the same type of stereotyping as saying that no-code Techs are CB hams. This stereotyping has no validity. Or that 5WPM Technicians can't be DXers (Heil). Just as an FYI, one of the worst jammers on the west coast was a Technician. He may have been an Extra at heart. These behaviours have nothing to do with one's license class and everything to do with the individual's already existing personality. Dee, N8UZE Dee, can I use your mailing address for FCC purposes? Hey! I saw her first. Wait in line. |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 18, 8:02 pm, "Paul W. Schlock" MM@beerenemasrule wrote: "KH6HZ" wrote in message ... wrote: You must have missed the part where this is about the use of Jeffrey Hermann's PO Box on Hawaii. And poor Brian still cant post a single reference to a postal regulation which stipulates a PO Box cannot be used by multiple people. Poor, Poor, Brian. They don't care about facts. All they linger on are the accusations. KH6HZ MICHAEL P DEIGNAN 706 S. Rodney French Blvd New Bedford MA 02744 WE1RD Lookups: 434 MICHAEL P DEIGNAN REPEATER ASSOCIATION 39 SUTTON ST APT 1 PROVIDENCE RI 02903 Callsign: KB1CCE Class: Club Codes: HAB USA Name: RF COMMANDOS RHODE ISLAND CHAPTER Addr1: 156 Gazza Road Addr2: Chepachet, RI 02814 Country: USA Effective: 30 May 2000 Expires: 20 Feb 2007 Online Renewals... FCC: ULS Listing Trustee: KH6HZ, MICHAEL P DEIGNAN ---------------- To freshen everyone's memory, here is a current search of the name, "Deignan:" __________________________________________________ _______________________ Callsign lookup results for: CALL "" NAME "DEIGNAN" CITY "" STATE "" ZIP "" LIMIT "0100" Program v1.3 - 8 March 1997 -- Last database update 1998-08-02 11:02 KH6HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P LIC ISU 4- DEC-1997 ADVANCED 136 NELSON ST LIC EXP 14- OCT-2007 PROVIDENCE RI 02908 LST UPD 4- DEC-1997 WH6DDR WAIKIKI WIRELESS ASSOCIATION LIC ISU 6- MAR-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 6- MAR-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 6- MAR-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDQ MANANA ISLAND IOTA GROUP LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDP RF COMMANDOS HAWAII CHAPTER LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDN PACIFIC ISLE DX SOCIETY LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDO KAMAAINA KILOWATT CLUB LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDM GREATER HONOLULU QRP SOCIETY LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830-0282 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE KB1CCE RF COMMANDOS RHODE ISLAND CHAPTER LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB 136 NELSON ST LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 PROVIDENCE RI 02908 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DCY CLOSED REPEATER COORDINATION SOCIETY LIC ISU 8- JAN-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 8- JAN-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830-0282 LST UPD 8- JAN-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DCX MICHAEL P DEIGNAN AMATEUR RADIO ASSOCIATLIC ISU 7- JAN-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 7- JAN-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830-0282 LST UPD 7- JAN-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE KB1AYF DEIGNAN, DIANE P LIC ISU 26- OCT-1993 TECH PLUS 136 NELSON ST LIC EXP 26- OCT-2003 PROVIDENCE RI 02908 LST UPD 24- FEB-1996 Since the above does not, for some strange reason, give a return for KD6HZ in its own right, everyone may be wondering who KD6HZ is. So I searched. The database said the call has been changed to KH6HZ. And who is KH6HZ? Well, none other than: HamCallTM Query Results: KH6HZ Click for map Country Info Michael P. Deignan 136 Nelson St Providence, RI 02908 License Class: Advanced Oh, GROAN! Shades of Wiseman. |
Let the Lying Begin, was: Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 18, 6:42 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote: KH6HZ For the record, none of the club callsigns I have ever KH6HZ trusteed for have been "vanity" callsigns. QRZ.COM disagrees. Is the following callsign sequentially issued? WE1RD Lookups: 434 I am not the trustee of that callsign. WE1RD Lookups: 434 MICHAEL P DEIGNAN REPEATER ASSOCIATION 39 SUTTON ST APT 1 PROVIDENCE RI 02903 Nice snip and dodge, Deignan. You're not the trustee of the "Michael P. Deignan Repeater Association?" That's too bad, because you being given credit for it. My quoted statement above is 100% accurate to this day. None of the club callsigns ever issued to me by the FCC have been vanity callsigns. Try to fabricate a more believable post next time. No fabrications. |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 18, 9:49 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote: 1) KD1HZ, 2) KD6HZ, 3) KH6HZ (Sequential??? Highly UNLIKLEY) Who is KD6HZ? Never heard of him (or her). Did I alledgedly have this callsign while travelling overseas on my Ocean-Going Trawler based out of Washington State? 13) WE1RD MICHAEL P DEIGNAN REPEATER ASSOCIATION Bzzzzt. Wrong again. Not the trustee of this one either. And the 11 others? Correct? No wonder all this slipped past the FCC, so many to keep track of. |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 18, 11:13 pm, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote: On Feb 18, 11:33 am, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: On Feb 17, 9:11 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote: wrote: Then you know Yes, I do. A PO Box can be for an individual, a business, or a household. In the case of the latter do, multiple individuals may receive mail there. Then you're either Jeffrey Hermann, Jeffrey Hermann's relation, or Jeffrey Hermann's employee. For the entire time I lived overseas, my U.S. mailing address, as far as the FCC was concerned was that of WA8JOC in Cincinnati. I did not physically reside there. I was not an employee of WA8JOC. I am not related to WA8JOC. Despite these things, my providing the FCC that address did not constitute fraud and it broke no laws. It didn't attempt to circumvent any laws. WA8JOC's address is still the FCC address of record for a number of Finnish radio amateurs who took and passed U.S. licensing exams. My own address is the FCC address of record for one Finnish radio amateur who took such an exam. The FCC says that applicants must have a U.S. address, not that the applicant must reside at that address. The applicant must either a U.S. Social Security number *or* a Taxpayer Identification Number. Those Finnish hams were able to obtain a TIN without ever having had a SSN. This was done after the FCC was contacted directly about the situation and asked what should be done. For all other mailing purposes in the U.S., my parents addresses in Kentucky and in Georgia were used as my address of record in the United States. I had not resided with them for decades. I broke no laws nor did I commit fraud. In 1993, I provided the Department of State a legal residence address which is the same as the address I now have. No mail was being sent here and there was not even a rural mailbox standing at this location. I didn't live here until 2000. You may now chew on these statements and attempt to reconcile them. Were you, WA8JOC, any number of Finnish radio amateurs, or your parents using Jeffrey Hermann's PO Box on Hawaii? It matters not, hot-ham-and-cheese, your premise is false. You must have missed the part where this is about the use of Jeffrey Hermann's PO Box on Hawaii. I didn't miss that at all. Why don't you quit attempting to manufacture something? Dave K8MN I manufactured none of that. Not my PO Box, not my addresses, not my callsigns. NOT MY LIES! You can thank Michael P Deignan in collusion with Jeff for bringing this blight on amateur radio. Thank you for your interest. |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 17, 9:07 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote: Hah. More fabricated Mikey D nonsense. PROVE to the court your HEARSAY "evidence" of "receiving them in Hawaii." The only thing you have in common with a judge, Lennie, is you drool and fall asleep in your chair. Is it any wonder that Deignan disrespects the law? He's above it. It is funny (and yet, pathetic at the same time) to see how Brian's mental gyrations continuously concoct new conspiracy theories on how I got my callsign(s). Lying and cheating come to mind. Pretty soon, he'll have me hacking into ULS or perhaps bribing government officials.to assign myself only the best, choice callsigns available. Maybe the PostMaster in Hawaii was in on it too! GASP! Horrors! Your words may come back to haunt you. |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 18, 1:49 pm, "Dee Flint" wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... [snip] I'm rarely surprised when an amateur behaving badly turns out to be a 20WPM Tested Extra. This is the same type of stereotyping as saying that no-code Techs are CB hams. This stereotyping has no validity. Is it the same type of stereotyping as saying that a 5WPM Technician cannot be a DXer? Just as an FYI, one of the worst jammers on the west coast was a Technician. And I'm sure that one of the best jammers on the West Coast was an Extra. |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 18, 10:20 pm, "Dee Flint" wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 18, 1:49 pm, "Dee Flint" wrote: wrote in message roups.com... [snip] I'm rarely surprised when an amateur behaving badly turns out to be a 20WPM Tested Extra. This is the same type of stereotyping as saying that no-code Techs are CB hams. This stereotyping has no validity. Or that 5WPM Technicians can't be DXers (Heil). Just as an FYI, one of the worst jammers on the west coast was a Technician. He may have been an Extra at heart. These behaviours have nothing to do with one's license class and everything to do with the individual's already existing personality. Dee, N8UZE Dee, can I use your mailing address for FCC purposes? Nope wouldn't let anyone (except my "gypsy" daughter) pick up mail here so it would not be valid for FCC purposes. Dee, N8UZE- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - C'mon, Dee, those 8-land callsigns really bust through the pile-ups. |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 18, 11:33 pm, "
wrote: From: "Dee Flint" on Sun, Feb 18 2007 1:49 pm These behaviours have nothing to do with one's license class and everything to do with the individual's already existing personality. Yes, we've all seen that with Heil, Miccolis, Kelly, and, once in a while, Flint. Note the slip in your first paragraph of denigrating Technician class as "worst jammer." Not to mention pointing out "west coast." Tsk, tsk. "Six land" (meaning primarily California) already has an over-abundance of amateur radio licensees. I doubt that you care very much about that since few non-residents want to gobble up calls from YOUR call area. Oh, and is "behaviour" anything similar to "endeavour?" Does it have a "colour?" A "flavour?" :-) LA Dee, Mike, and Robesin went to offshore finishing schools. |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 18, 9:42�pm, wrote:
On Feb 18, 8:38 pm, wrote: On Feb 18, 1:28?pm, "KH6HZ" wrote: wrote: Who was harmed by the assignment of those vanity callsigns? For the record, none of the club callsigns I have ever trusteed for have been "vanity" callsigns. Ooops - looks like I was mistaken about the vanity aspect. If they were not vanity callsigns, then they were all sequentially issued, right? Yes, nine (9) sequentially issued for Hawaii. Not a dozen, and not vanity. *Here's a query that I ran in 1998 or 1999. *Note the PO Box #... no wonder Jeff was working hard to disassociate himself from the guy that hijacked his PO Box. How do you know the PO Box was "hijacked"? ---------- Callsign lookup results for: CALL "" NAME "DEIGNAN" CITY "" STATE "" ZIP "" LIMIT "0100" Program v1.3 - 8 March 1997 -- Last database update 1998-08-02 11:02 So this is from almost a decade ago. KH6HZ *DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P *LIC ISU *4-DEC-1997 ADVANCED * * Not an Extra - an Advanced! WH6DDR * *WAIKIKI WIRELESS ASSOCIATION * * * WH6DDQ * * * * * * MANANA ISLAND IOTA GROUP * * * WH6DDP * * * * * * RF COMMANDOS HAWAII CHAPTER * WH6DDN * * * * * * PACIFIC ISLE DX SOCIETY * * * * * * WH6DDO * * * * * * KAMAAINA KILOWATT CLUB * * WH6DDM * * * * * * GREATER HONOLULU QRP SOCIETY * * * * * * KB1CCE * * * * * * RF COMMANDOS RHODE ISLAND CHAPTER * * WH6DCY * * * * * * CLOSED REPEATER COORDINATION WH6DCX * * * * * * MICHAEL P DEIGNAN AMATEUR RADIO Since the above does not, for some strange reason, give a return for KD6HZ in its own right, everyone may be wondering who KD6HZ is. *So I searched. *The database said the call has been changed to KH6HZ. *And who is KH6HZ? Well, none other than: HamCallTM Query Results: *KH6HZ Michael P. Deignan License Class: Advanced So the guy changed his call a couple of times. Is that not allowed by the rules? ------------------ I will reword my questions, then: Why? Because they are not vanity calls. *Deignan has been busted, "busted"? How? What was the penalty? and your support of him is noted. What support? I am simply trying to get to the bottom of these alleged violations. So far, it turns out that at least some of the information supplied here was incorrect. It turns out that: - the disputed callsigns were not vanity callsigns, - FCC requires a mailing address, not residence or station location - there is no limit on the number of clubs that can name an individual as trustee - the person in question was not an Extra when all this happened. 1) KD1HZ, 2) KD6HZ, 3) KH6HZ *(Sequential??? *Highly UNLIKLEY) Are any of those callsigns in dispute? 4) WH6DDR, 5) WH6DDQ, 6) WH6DDP, 7) WH6DDM, 8) WH6DDN, 9) *WH6DDO, 10) *WH6DCX, 11) *WH6DCY, 12) KB1CCE, Nine callsigns, not a dozen. Are any of them current? 13) WE1RD MICHAEL P DEIGNAN REPEATER ASSOCIATION That one is current - and the trustee is not Mr. Deignan. So what's the problem? Jim, N2EY |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 19, 8:20�am, wrote:
On Feb 18, 11:33 pm, " wrote: From: "Dee Flint" on Sun, Feb 18 2007 1:49 pm These behaviours have nothing to do with one's license class and everything to do with the individual's already existing personality. * *Yes, we've all seen that with Heil, Miccolis, Kelly, and, * *once in a while, Flint. *Note the slip in your first * *paragraph of denigrating Technician class as "worst jammer." * *Not to mention pointing out "west coast." *Tsk, tsk. * *"Six land" (meaning primarily California) already has an * *over-abundance of amateur radio licensees. *I doubt that * *you care very much about that since few non-residents want * *to gobble up calls from YOUR call area. * *Oh, and is "behaviour" anything similar to "endeavour?" * *Does it have a "colour?" *A "flavour?" *:-) * *LA Dee, Mike, and Robesin went to offshore finishing schools. Obviously they've never finished... :-) LA |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
|
Residence vs. Mailing Address
|
Residence vs. Mailing Address
From: Dave Heil on Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:11:06 GMT
wrote: The FCC has released its latest operating budget listing over its web page. Anyone who cares to can go check it out. The ARRL never reveals its budget plans to the public, despite all its Believers' claims that it is handled in a "democratic fashion"... Where is it mandated that the ARRL reveal its budget plan? Oh, oh, little red-hatted monkey's ox has been gored! Stand by while the Schutzstaffel marches on (with hob- nailed boots) to DEMAND explanations for such egregious negative commentary! [Zey tink dey haf vays of making me cringe and beg for mercy? :-) ] If the ARRL is as open and above-board as they imply, they should make everything known to their membership. Of course, if they did that then they would have to (by law) reveal the annual salaries of their highest- paid staff...some of whom have tried to "debate" things in here AS IF they were jes' good ol' boys. :-) The League is governed by an elected board of directors who live all over the United States. Those directors are elected by League members from their geographical area. Wah, wah, wah...AS IF the League "represented ALL amateur licensees" in a "democratic manner" AS LAWFUL as any federal government body. BS. They are a PRIVATE membership entity and the membership represents ONLY a quarter of the total US amateur radio licensees. ...AS IF it were an arm of the guvmint. I don't know of anyone saying that except for you. Then you don't know much, are a BELIEVER in everything the League says they are/do, and have an extremely POOR memory of what has been claimed by other Believers in here in past years. Of course YOU have FAILED to secure a Directorship, haven't you? :-) Are you making brown-nose statements in here to gain a better image for another election? :-) The best one can hope for is someone else getting copies of its IRS Returns and publicizes those. Otherwise we "common folk" would never know its a multi-million dollar "non-profit" organization. The League must submit all kinds of paperwork to government. Name ALL of them besides the annual IRS Tax Returns. Remember your organ grinder's ****y pedantry on EXACT figures and details. Do as he says and he might give you some of the pennies out of his tin cup you carry. If government finds a problem, do you think it will sweep it under the rug, or will it address the problem? Let's just say it will NOT be national news carried in journalistic circles as Page 1 material. :-) The ARRL is still very "small potatoes" as membership organizations go. How are you involved? Tsk, tsk. Your only "comment" here seems to be on a simple comment I made about the FCC. The FCC has definitely posted their proposed annual budget. I just pointed out that the ARRL never does that sort of thing...and that got your ox gored somehow. I'm "not involved" with the FCC. I don't work there, nor for them. But, I am a citizen of the United States, was one long before you came into existance. I CAN speak to MY government without "being involved" IN the government. You aren't an ARRL member. You have no standing in the ARRL. You have no vote in ARRL matters. Wah, wah, wah...there you go again with the "not involved" routine. :-) The ARRL loves to Talk Big and say it "represents all US radio amateurs." They can't possibly represent all, not even close to a majority status. They are a MINORITY membership group. But, their survival as a profit-making publisher DEPENDS on their PR image. THAT income keeps them going, pays their bills, pays their staff, the whole thing...with the possible exception of QST staff which depends on ad sales to break even. Simple economics. Praise themselves, build the image, draw in customers, get them to pay for things. Along the way they can build a core membership that becomes a devoted following of Believers. Like yourself. Politically, the ARRL is a SPECIAL-INTEREST group. Not only does the ARRL have a professional lobbyist firm on retainer in DC but their "rep" allows government types to notice the pretty logotype on their papers and "important" titles of their officers. They have "no" influence, are altruistic in some kind of extreme? BS. In the past three-decades-plus, the ARRL has, most definitely toadied to the brass-pounders, over-emphasized that singular skill over and above all other skills. Their skewed demographics (relative to the total amateur licensees in US) of their core membership (olde-tymers, life members, etc) shows that. Their "casual" mention of "CW" over all other modes in publications shows that...their core membership loves that sort of thing. But, the ARRL's core membership is following normal human life attrition. That means their membership is dwindling. If the membership is dwindling, then the demographics of member numbers presented to advertisers twice a year shows a declining market space. Dues for membership are a very SMALL part of the ARRL's income. They've already shown their need for funding with repeated requests for donations of all kinds over and above their membership dues. The ARRL's PR tune is being rewritten now. The small coterie of movers and shakers in/around Newington aren't stupid. FCC 06-178 marks one of the significant, if not most significant event in US amateur radio history of the past half century. Old-fashioned morse code mode is NO LONGER the featured epitome of amateur radio operating skills...if we are to read between the lines of their latest "midnight exams" news posting. But, at the same time, those that want to become one with the olde-tymers can take a code test before 23 Feb 07. That is a clear sign the ARRL is trying to please BOTH sides of the morse code testing issue. They need to be careful in straddling the opinion fence lest they do physical damage to themselves. Either way, it does not matter to me except for the PR they use to masquerade as a "representative of all [US] amateurs." Pfaughh. I'm a Life Member of a professional association. Pros aren't amateurs...yet some pros like to also be amateurs when not involved in professional work. You revile that for some twisted personal reason. You don't understand that a professional radio operator license takes as much effort and knowledge (perhaps more) as any amateur radio operator license. Why? To reinforce your own PR image of an 'amateur expert' through morse code skill? To ACT the "superior" by reviling all who do not respect your mighty amateur 'accomplishments?' Do you have an ACTOR's guild membership? Why do you wish to suppress all opinions against the only national amateur radio member organization in the United States? What are you hiding? |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
|
Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 19, 9:44?pm, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote: From: Dave Heil on Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:11:06 GMT This message is on its third or fourth incarnation. It will continue indefinitely until you answer some of the points made...in a logical, emotionless, civil manner. The "ghost in your machine" is expected to haunt you for a very long time. :-) Booooo! :-) LA |
Residence vs. Mailing Address
Gee Bry, for someone who went ballistic when his address was posted, you
seem to have no qualms about doing the same Hey Dipwad!! how's that report coming WHAT A HYPOCRITE now watch..little Marcus Morgan, the Jewish Nazi will come running to you defense A pair of sickos wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 18, 8:02 pm, "Paul W. Schlock" MM@beerenemasrule wrote: "KH6HZ" wrote in message ... wrote: You must have missed the part where this is about the use of Jeffrey Hermann's PO Box on Hawaii. And poor Brian still cant post a single reference to a postal regulation which stipulates a PO Box cannot be used by multiple people. Poor, Poor, Brian. They don't care about facts. All they linger on are the accusations. KH6HZ MICHAEL P DEIGNAN 706 S. Rodney French Blvd New Bedford MA 02744 WE1RD Lookups: 434 MICHAEL P DEIGNAN REPEATER ASSOCIATION 39 SUTTON ST APT 1 PROVIDENCE RI 02903 Callsign: KB1CCE Class: Club Codes: HAB USA Name: RF COMMANDOS RHODE ISLAND CHAPTER Addr1: 156 Gazza Road Addr2: Chepachet, RI 02814 Country: USA Effective: 30 May 2000 Expires: 20 Feb 2007 Online Renewals... FCC: ULS Listing Trustee: KH6HZ, MICHAEL P DEIGNAN ---------------- To freshen everyone's memory, here is a current search of the name, "Deignan:" __________________________________________________ _______________________ Callsign lookup results for: CALL "" NAME "DEIGNAN" CITY "" STATE "" ZIP "" LIMIT "0100" Program v1.3 - 8 March 1997 -- Last database update 1998-08-02 11:02 KH6HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P LIC ISU 4- DEC-1997 ADVANCED 136 NELSON ST LIC EXP 14- OCT-2007 PROVIDENCE RI 02908 LST UPD 4- DEC-1997 WH6DDR WAIKIKI WIRELESS ASSOCIATION LIC ISU 6- MAR-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 6- MAR-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 6- MAR-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDQ MANANA ISLAND IOTA GROUP LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDP RF COMMANDOS HAWAII CHAPTER LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDN PACIFIC ISLE DX SOCIETY LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDO KAMAAINA KILOWATT CLUB LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDM GREATER HONOLULU QRP SOCIETY LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830-0282 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE KB1CCE RF COMMANDOS RHODE ISLAND CHAPTER LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB 136 NELSON ST LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 PROVIDENCE RI 02908 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DCY CLOSED REPEATER COORDINATION SOCIETY LIC ISU 8- JAN-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 8- JAN-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830-0282 LST UPD 8- JAN-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DCX MICHAEL P DEIGNAN AMATEUR RADIO ASSOCIATLIC ISU 7- JAN-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 7- JAN-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830-0282 LST UPD 7- JAN-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE KB1AYF DEIGNAN, DIANE P LIC ISU 26- OCT-1993 TECH PLUS 136 NELSON ST LIC EXP 26- OCT-2003 PROVIDENCE RI 02908 LST UPD 24- FEB-1996 Since the above does not, for some strange reason, give a return for KD6HZ in its own right, everyone may be wondering who KD6HZ is. So I searched. The database said the call has been changed to KH6HZ. And who is KH6HZ? Well, none other than: HamCallTM Query Results: KH6HZ Click for map Country Info Michael P. Deignan 136 Nelson St Providence, RI 02908 License Class: Advanced |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com