Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 15, 4:05�pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote: I doubt that "we" are going to get to vote on anything. *Only those who consider themselves to be "eligible" are allowed to "vote." Of course, you could always post your support, or lack thereof, in news.groups.proposals. Tsk, tsk...you didn't look far enough...it is there also. However, as is evidenced by your behaviour here for the past decade, I doubt you could "behave" yourself long enough to construct a concise statement of approval/disappoval which would pass the muster of the moderators of news.groups.proposals. Not being of the UK, I don't have a "behaviour." But, "admonishment" from someone who had FAKE HAWAIIAN RESIDENCY and a dozen FAKE "clubs" with trusteeship calls for same, your "admonishment" is ten kinds of HYPOCRISY. Tsk, tsk. What you "doubt" is of no concern to me. You have been ever so critical of my viewpoints for years. Why stop to consider anything if your mindset is set in concrete? :-) You might consider that the FCC announced (on 15 Dec 06) that 06-178 would ELIMINATE code testing for ALL U.S. amateur radio licenses. That is only about 7 days away. My advocacy has always been to eliminate that code test. Can you put two and two together and get the 100%- correct 4? Go QRT little man. LA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
3rd RFD: rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated (LAST CALL FOR COMMENTS) | Antenna | |||
3rd RFD: rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated (LAST CALL FOR COMMENTS) | Dx | |||
You don't need any more proof. | General | |||
Radio call letters: What do they mean? | Shortwave | |||
The Pool | Policy |