Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
No Code VEC
On Feb 21, 3:12�pm, wrote:
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:09:04 -0500, "Dee Flint" wrote: "John Smith I" wrote in message ... wrote: ... * To those who say "NAY! *NEVER!" I award the venerable * *"cat-ass-trophy." Len: I think all whos' only purpose is for the continuation of amateur radio in a relevant and up-to-date manner will agree, logical questions, exams, examiners, methods and procedures need to be established, followed, and upheld--and, especially in regards to realignment with present rules and regulations. Attrition should continue on at its' accelerating pace and shortly remove any doubt as to the death of morse. *CW is a problem which has fittingly supplied its' own fix and is now engaged in implementing that fix (death.) All new hams need only be aware of the past sins of arrl and the fanatic devotion to CW and personalities as opposed to principals which has caused cat-ass-trophy-type-damage to amateur radio and to steer clear of the arrl or any movements to re-establish some pseudo-class system amongst amateurs and thereby replace the "CW class system" with a new and equally insane and damaging one. We need history to help us avoid making the same old mistakes anew ... The old-timers need to be avoided like the plague. *The old failed methods and tactics need to be avoided. *The future needs to meet up with amateur radio and bring it to life in the new millennium. JS And your specific proposals are? *Just saying that one needs to avoid the old and come up with something new is useless. *Concrete ideas and specific plans are needed. did you read the following"All new hams need only be aware of the past sins of arrl and the fanatic *devotion to CW and personalities as opposed to principals which has caused cat-ass-trophy-type-damage to amateur radio and to steer clear of the arrl or any movements to re-establish some pseudo-class system amongst amateurs and thereby replace the "CW class system" with a new and equally insane and damaging one." looks a fairly derect suggestion to finish undoing incentive lciensing and not replace it with anything like it the future Dee wants Absolute, Detailed, Worked-Out, Vetted and Verified (officially) NEW plans. Otherwise, the old system is good enough for her. Why not? She "earned" her rank-status-title-privileges under the old system. A new system would put that beloved rank-status-title-privileges in jeopardy. A "NEW" thing can be worked out democratically by simply submitting a Proposal to the FCC. Naturally the ARRL will be opposed to that...unless They submitted it. :-) Evolution will happen, like it or not. Old species (such as morseodists) will become extinct. Such is the way of evolution. However, Dino-sours bones are sort-of interesting to study...as are old fossils. Regardez, LA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
One way to promote learning of code ... | Policy | |||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? | Policy | |||
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life. | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | CB | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy |