Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
USMC Waxes Part 15 Devices
wrote in message ps.com... http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/02/26/sig....ap/index.html One could take the garage door opener manufacturer to small claims court...and win...unless the manufacturer specifically warned that their system could be rendered useless anytime at the discretion of the military (which I highly doubt they did). A good attorney might even consider a class action lawsuit on this one and make lots of money. The manufacturers knew the risk and gambled. Their customers lost. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
USMC Waxes Part 15 Devices
On Feb 26, 9:51?pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote:
wrote in message ps.com... http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/02/26/sig....ap/index.html One could take the garage door opener manufacturer to small claims court...and win...unless the manufacturer specifically warned that their system could be rendered useless anytime at the discretion of the military (which I highly doubt they did). A good attorney might even consider a class action lawsuit on this one and make lots of money. The manufacturers knew the risk and gambled. Their customers lost. I doubt that, Stefan, but you never know. Having read your item here I turned over a couple of radios (broadcast types) that I have here in the house, and both of them had the usual Part 15 caveat about "may not cause harm" and "must accept interference from" paragraphs, so the manufcturers ARE "warning" people about such uses. Granted, John Q Public probably never reads those warnings, and if they did, has no idea what they mean. This isn't a new event, either. There was a similar rash of consumer device failures in and around MCAS El Toro, CA, MCAS(H) Tustin, CA, and Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton in the mid-80's. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
USMC Waxes Part 15 Devices
"K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 26, 9:51?pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote: wrote in message ps.com... http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/02/26/sig....ap/index.html One could take the garage door opener manufacturer to small claims court...and win...unless the manufacturer specifically warned that their system could be rendered useless anytime at the discretion of the military (which I highly doubt they did). A good attorney might even consider a class action lawsuit on this one and make lots of money. The manufacturers knew the risk and gambled. Their customers lost. I doubt that, Stefan, but you never know. Having read your item here I turned over a couple of radios (broadcast types) that I have here in the house, and both of them had the usual Part 15 caveat about "may not cause harm" and "must accept interference from" paragraphs, so the manufcturers ARE "warning" people about such uses. Granted, John Q Public probably never reads those warnings, and if they did, has no idea what they mean. This isn't a new event, either. There was a similar rash of consumer device failures in and around MCAS El Toro, CA, MCAS(H) Tustin, CA, and Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton in the mid-80's. I'm sure the Government warning is there but I would sue anyway. They probably would not bother to show up in court and I would win by default. If they were so inclined to show up, they would have to pay attorney's fees higher than the manufacturer's cost of the probably so they might even go for a settlement or allow a default judgement against them. This is not occaisional interference; what it means is that one day your product simply ceases to function. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
USMC Waxes Part 15 Devices
On Feb 26, 9:51?pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote:
wrote in message ps.com... http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/02/26/sig....ap/index.html One could take the garage door opener manufacturer to small claims court...and win...unless the manufacturer specifically warned that their system could be rendered useless anytime at the discretion of the military (which I highly doubt they did). A good attorney might even consider a class action lawsuit on this one and make lots of money. The manufacturers knew the risk and gambled. Their customers lost. But who are you going to sue? This has gone around-and-around before and the "consumer" always comes up on the short end of the stick simply because the manufacturer DOES show up with a copy of the law under their arm, demonstrates that their device IS in compliance, and that is, as they say, that. It's a simple matter to engineer in additional filtering, but with extra filtering comes extra cost. However with the transmitting unit restricted to the radiation limits of Part 15, it still won't take much in a strong field to overcome even rudimentary filtering. Good luck with the case, though...Do let us know how it goes. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
USMC Waxes Part 15 Devices
"K4YZ" wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 26, 9:51?pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote: wrote in message ps.com... http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/02/26/sig....ap/index.html One could take the garage door opener manufacturer to small claims court...and win...unless the manufacturer specifically warned that their system could be rendered useless anytime at the discretion of the military (which I highly doubt they did). A good attorney might even consider a class action lawsuit on this one and make lots of money. The manufacturers knew the risk and gambled. Their customers lost. But who are you going to sue? You would sue the one with deep pockets, probably the manufacturer but it could also be home depot or sears or wherever one purchased it. This has gone around-and-around before and the "consumer" always comes up on the short end of the stick simply because the manufacturer DOES show up with a copy of the law under their arm, demonstrates that their device IS in compliance, and that is, as they say, that. It is compliant, yes. But it doesn't work. That is the basis of the suit in small claims court. It's a simple matter to engineer in additional filtering, but with extra filtering comes extra cost. However with the transmitting unit restricted to the radiation limits of Part 15, it still won't take much in a strong field to overcome even rudimentary filtering. The manufacturer can then be ordered to provide all customers with a free filter upgrade, depending on what the judge says. Good luck with the case, though...Do let us know how it goes. Well, I'm not doing the suing...but I would if it happened to me, believe me. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY! | Policy | |||
HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY! | General | |||
Part # 2 - The Simplest Shortwave Listener (SWL) Antennas That I Know Of . . . | Shortwave | |||
802.11x and part 97 | Digital | |||
802.11x and part 97 | Digital |