Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old February 27th 07, 03:51 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 179
Default USMC Waxes Part 15 Devices


wrote in message
ps.com...
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/02/26/sig....ap/index.html


One could take the garage door opener manufacturer to small claims
court...and win...unless the manufacturer specifically warned that their
system could be rendered useless anytime at the discretion of the military
(which I highly doubt they did). A good attorney might even consider a class
action lawsuit on this one and make lots of money. The manufacturers knew
the risk and gambled. Their customers lost.


  #2   Report Post  
Old February 27th 07, 09:47 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 447
Default USMC Waxes Part 15 Devices

On Feb 26, 9:51?pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote:
wrote in message

ps.com...

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/02/26/sig....ap/index.html


One could take the garage door opener manufacturer to small claims
court...and win...unless the manufacturer specifically warned that their
system could be rendered useless anytime at the discretion of the military
(which I highly doubt they did). A good attorney might even consider a class
action lawsuit on this one and make lots of money. The manufacturers knew
the risk and gambled. Their customers lost.


I doubt that, Stefan, but you never know.

Having read your item here I turned over a couple of radios
(broadcast types) that I have here in the house, and both of them had
the usual Part 15 caveat about "may not cause harm" and "must accept
interference from" paragraphs, so the manufcturers ARE "warning"
people about such uses.

Granted, John Q Public probably never reads those warnings, and
if they did, has no idea what they mean.

This isn't a new event, either. There was a similar rash of
consumer device failures in and around MCAS El Toro, CA, MCAS(H)
Tustin, CA, and Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton in the mid-80's.

73

Steve, K4YZ

  #3   Report Post  
Old February 27th 07, 11:56 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 179
Default USMC Waxes Part 15 Devices


"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 26, 9:51?pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote:
wrote in message

ps.com...

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/02/26/sig....ap/index.html


One could take the garage door opener manufacturer to small claims
court...and win...unless the manufacturer specifically warned that their
system could be rendered useless anytime at the discretion of the
military
(which I highly doubt they did). A good attorney might even consider a
class
action lawsuit on this one and make lots of money. The manufacturers knew
the risk and gambled. Their customers lost.


I doubt that, Stefan, but you never know.

Having read your item here I turned over a couple of radios
(broadcast types) that I have here in the house, and both of them had
the usual Part 15 caveat about "may not cause harm" and "must accept
interference from" paragraphs, so the manufcturers ARE "warning"
people about such uses.

Granted, John Q Public probably never reads those warnings, and
if they did, has no idea what they mean.

This isn't a new event, either. There was a similar rash of
consumer device failures in and around MCAS El Toro, CA, MCAS(H)
Tustin, CA, and Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton in the mid-80's.


I'm sure the Government warning is there but I would sue anyway. They
probably would not bother to show up in court and I would win by default. If
they were so inclined to show up, they would have to pay attorney's fees
higher than the manufacturer's cost of the probably so they might even go
for a settlement or allow a default judgement against them. This is not
occaisional interference; what it means is that one day your product simply
ceases to function.


  #4   Report Post  
Old February 28th 07, 07:44 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 447
Default USMC Waxes Part 15 Devices

On Feb 26, 9:51?pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote:
wrote in message

ps.com...

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/02/26/sig....ap/index.html


One could take the garage door opener manufacturer to small claims
court...and win...unless the manufacturer specifically warned that their
system could be rendered useless anytime at the discretion of the military
(which I highly doubt they did). A good attorney might even consider a class
action lawsuit on this one and make lots of money. The manufacturers knew
the risk and gambled. Their customers lost.


But who are you going to sue?

This has gone around-and-around before and the "consumer" always
comes up on the short end of the stick simply because the manufacturer
DOES show up with a copy of the law under their arm, demonstrates that
their device IS in compliance, and that is, as they say, that.

It's a simple matter to engineer in additional filtering, but
with extra filtering comes extra cost. However with the transmitting
unit restricted to the radiation limits of Part 15, it still won't
take much in a strong field to overcome even rudimentary filtering.

Good luck with the case, though...Do let us know how it goes.

73

Steve, K4YZ

  #5   Report Post  
Old March 1st 07, 12:15 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 179
Default USMC Waxes Part 15 Devices


"K4YZ" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Feb 26, 9:51?pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote:
wrote in message

ps.com...

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/02/26/sig....ap/index.html


One could take the garage door opener manufacturer to small claims
court...and win...unless the manufacturer specifically warned that their
system could be rendered useless anytime at the discretion of the
military
(which I highly doubt they did). A good attorney might even consider a
class
action lawsuit on this one and make lots of money. The manufacturers knew
the risk and gambled. Their customers lost.


But who are you going to sue?


You would sue the one with deep pockets, probably the manufacturer but it
could also be home depot or sears or wherever one purchased it.

This has gone around-and-around before and the "consumer" always
comes up on the short end of the stick simply because the manufacturer
DOES show up with a copy of the law under their arm, demonstrates that
their device IS in compliance, and that is, as they say, that.


It is compliant, yes. But it doesn't work. That is the basis of the suit in
small claims court.

It's a simple matter to engineer in additional filtering, but
with extra filtering comes extra cost. However with the transmitting
unit restricted to the radiation limits of Part 15, it still won't
take much in a strong field to overcome even rudimentary filtering.


The manufacturer can then be ordered to provide all customers with a free
filter upgrade, depending on what the judge says.


Good luck with the case, though...Do let us know how it goes.


Well, I'm not doing the suing...but I would if it happened to me, believe
me.




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY! N9OGL Policy 135 August 25th 06 01:17 PM
HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY! N9OGL General 79 August 23rd 06 07:51 AM
Part # 2 - The Simplest Shortwave Listener (SWL) Antennas That I Know Of . . . RHF Shortwave 0 June 2nd 06 10:57 AM
802.11x and part 97 mark Digital 2 February 26th 04 12:48 PM
802.11x and part 97 mark Digital 0 February 26th 04 07:32 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017