| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
John Smith I wrote:
Over in RRAM there seems to be much debate on the need for HS data communications, strange ... Seems like in a REAL disaster, the need to xmit satellite maps of flood areas, earthquake damage to bridges, structures, fires, hostiles?, technical docs, medical documents/instructions/directions, signs, plans, email, web data, etc. would be most appreciated if not desperately needed. While VHF+ (satellite comms would be good!) may be suitable for some flat terrain and moderate distances, availability of HF communications, surely, would be a requirement in many situations A laptop consumes VERY LITTLE power and can turn any xceiver into a VERY powerful data transmission tool; most today would consider it a requirement rather than a luxury. However, PSK is highly unsuitable and the development of REAL tools remains for the future ... new minds with up-to-date technology, methods and skills will accomplishing this. The future is coming ... like it or not. JS |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| need help with xmission line xformer | Homebrew | |||
| meltdown in progress | Policy | |||
| Moderator Policy for proposed rec.radio.amateur.policy.moderated | Policy | |||
| Bend in xmission line | Antenna | |||
| Series-Section Xmission Line Impedance Matching | Antenna | |||