Q. How many free marketers does it take to change a light bulb?

A. None. In the free market it will fix itself.

Well, not radio but it is politics, thus on topic. :-)

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:18:50 -0400, "Stefan Wolfe"
wrote:

Q. How many free marketers does it take to change a light bulb?

A. None. In the free market it will fix itself.

Well, not radio but it is politics, thus on topic. :-)
policy is the topic so you are off topic again

the job is amrginal at best

How about this one:

Q. How many no-coders does it take to change a lot bulb?

A. None. They don't change it because it takes too much work.

On Mar 23, 10:17?pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote:
wrote in message

...

On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:18:50 -0400, "Stefan Wolfe"
wrote:

Q. How many free marketers does it take to change a light bulb?

A. None. In the free market it will fix itself.

Well, not radio but it is politics, thus on topic. :-)
policy is the topic so you are off topic again

the job is amrginal at best

How about this one:

Q. How many no-coders does it take to change a lot bulb?

A. None. They don't change it because it takes too much work.

LOL, Thanks for the laugh.

On Mar 23, 10:49�pm, wrote:
On 23 Mar 2007 19:34:10 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:





On Mar 23, 10:17?pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote:
wrote in message

. ..

On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:18:50 -0400, "Stefan Wolfe"
wrote:

Q. How many free marketers does it take to change a light bulb?

A. None. In the free market it will fix itself.

Well, not radio but it is politics, thus on topic. :-)
policy is the topic so you are off topic again

the job is amrginal at best

How about this one:

Q. How many no-coders does it take to change a lot bulb?

A. None. They don't change it because it takes too much work.

LOL, *Thanks for the laugh.

break your own rules again Dloyd

hypocritehttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What rule is that Morkie?

"Dloyd Lavies" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Mar 23, 10:49?pm, wrote:
On 23 Mar 2007 19:34:10 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:





On Mar 23, 10:17?pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote:
wrote in message

. ..

On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:18:50 -0400, "Stefan Wolfe"
wrote:

Q. How many free marketers does it take to change a light bulb?

A. None. In the free market it will fix itself.

Well, not radio but it is politics, thus on topic. :-)
policy is the topic so you are off topic again

the job is amrginal at best

How about this one:

Q. How many no-coders does it take to change a lot bulb?

A. None. They don't change it because it takes too much work.

LOL, Thanks for the laugh.

break your own rules again Dloyd

hypocritehttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

What rule is that Morkie?

Give him a minute. He'll make one up.

wrote in message
...
On 23 Mar 2007 20:19:05 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

On Mar 23, 10:49?pm, wrote:
On 23 Mar 2007 19:34:10 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:





On Mar 23, 10:17?pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote:
wrote in message

. ..

On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:18:50 -0400, "Stefan Wolfe"

wrote:

Q. How many free marketers does it take to change a light bulb?

A. None. In the free market it will fix itself.

Well, not radio but it is politics, thus on topic. :-)
policy is the topic so you are off topic again

the job is amrginal at best

How about this one:

Q. How many no-coders does it take to change a lot bulb?

A. None. They don't change it because it takes too much work.

LOL, hanks for the laugh.

break your own rules again Dloyd

hypocritehttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What rule is that Morkie?
the rule claims prevent me from answering posts not addressed to me

So when are you going to abide by the rules?

On Mar 23, 11:48?pm, wrote:
break your own rules again Dloyd

hypocritehttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

What rule is that Morkie?

the rule claims prevent me from answering posts not addressed to me

hypocrtiehttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/


Here is a prime example of you twisting things around. I never said
that you shouldn't answer post unless they are addressed to you. What
I said was that you shouldn't reply to posts that are directed to
SOMEONE ELSE, as an example would be if I and Stafan Wolfe was in
direct dialog discussing some topic through the board and then you
decide to chime in with some irrelevant information. In this case,
the original thread was not directed to anyone, except the group as a
whole, whereas anyone can respond because no dialog had been borne of
this post, but as many threads spur dialog between two people on
certain points and turn into a conversations between two or more
people, it best to let that play out and not interfere, unless you can
actually add something to the discussion. However, in your case,
whereas two people are have a discussion throught the board, you want
to chime in and say 'Just another stalking thread" or "only in your
dreams woger" thus hijacking the thread. This is prime example of why
rational people cannot reason with you because you twist things
around. Instead of admitting that you have problems with comprehension
and logic, (which frequently is manifested in individuals that also
have dyslexia), and ask for understanding from the group. You think we
are all stalking or harrassing you. Then in turn you seem to want to
punish the group for your problem.

That Mark is why so many people just get tired of your bull and go on
the attack. Like I've said before, if you didn't act like and a-hole
all of the time, hijacking almost every thread, maybe someone would
treat you with respect.

Dloyd

On Mar 24, 11:20�am, wrote:
On 24 Mar 2007 06:32:54 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

On Mar 23, 11:48?pm, wrote:
break your own rules again Dloyd

hypocritehttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

What rule is that Morkie?

the rule claims prevent me from answering posts not addressed to me

hypocrtiehttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

Here is a prime example of you twisting things around. *I never said
that you shouldn't answer post unless they are addressed to you. *

lying sack of ****http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Prove where I have lied. You like to make your stupid accusations,
but yet you do not offer one iota of proof. Mark, no one can have a
discussion with you because of your apparent low IQ, I honestly
believe that you suffer from BIF, it must be really hard going through
life suffering from so many mental impairments. Your wife must have
been hard up to have married a fat balding mental patient. I guess
she though her biological clock was ticking away and went into a panic
to get married. Any pregnancy yet? I know Gav was hoping for kids.
If you can't get the job done, maybe Woger can help you out.

Dloyd

On Mar 24, 12:36�pm, wrote:
On 24 Mar 2007 09:32:24 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:





On Mar 24, 11:20?am, wrote:
On 24 Mar 2007 06:32:54 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

On Mar 23, 11:48?pm, wrote:
break your own rules again Dloyd

hypocritehttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

What rule is that Morkie?

the rule claims prevent me from answering posts not addressed to me

hypocrtiehttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

Here is a prime example of you twisting things around. * * *never said
that you shouldn't answer post unless they are addressed to you.

lying sack of ****http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Prove where I have lied. *

you have done that for me

you are the one that make stupid accusation and you never back em up

you make up and fail to follow them hypocrtiehttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Mark define "them", your fourth grade level responses are not very
articulate. If you are going to respond, at least you could write in
a manner that adequately addresses the post, not with little short
snipits. Unless of course you low IQ prevents you from authoring an
adequate response, you may ask for consideration in light of your BIF
(borderline intellectual functioning). Once again you have failed to
show adequate proof of where I have lied. Now you accuse me of
"making accusation and you never back em up." Provide an example of
where I have done what you say, unless of course you have not proof
whatsoever. I have provided examples of your behavior and have had
some success in finally getting you to admit the truth.

At one time you indicated that you never lie and you don't hijack
threads.

But recently, you finally admitted to doing both of these behaviors,
the truth will set you free.

"Extreme Hypocrite Mark Morgan"

Dloyd

On Mar 24, 9:32 am, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:

be adivised this a areply to known theif and cyber stalker