Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
dloyd lavies cyber terroists
On Mar 28, 12:21?am, wrote:
On 27 Mar 2007 20:13:34 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote: On Mar 27, 11:02?pm, wrote: On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:57:28 -0400, "KH6HZ" wrote: "Dloyd Lavies" wrote: Doesn't he have a cool cookbook, and Steven Segal videos? I could use that as a fire starter I guess more proof of the crimial nature of your actions against Dloyd that you provided futher blood in the water this BTW Dloyd the reason it ****es me off so I am tried of the stlaker like Mike I am replying to continuing to harras e with such inane postings Then stop responding to every single post, that is your option, but you contine to feed the frenzy (pouring blood into the water). I am also tired, but I have no solution to the issue that you would agree upon. your point I am responding that your said you were tired of the BS, I agree but I have no solution, that is your sole responsibilty to find a way to deal with it without including everyone on the group I can only control myself and my actions...... never said otherwise Dloyd I never said you did but when you take action that have reasonably forseeable consequences you share inthe respoiniblity for the actions of those 3rd parties First I have seen no proof of consequenses that you said occured, I therefore share in nothing but my own actions. You set out to obtain the attention of everyone on the group with your reign of harrassment. You made a point that you have so many friends, and I legally obtained information that appears to discredit you. when you posted about my wife and certain book you knew or should have known that the filth mongers would run with it What is the problem, this information was available on a public accessible profile. If you or a member of your family are "in the closet" certainly they should have had better sense than to make that information widely available to the public. There wasn't any breaking in or "hacking" into anything. Your mad at me because your family member didn't have enough sense to keep her private information private and I discovered this information. You implied we were at war quoting from the "Art of War", and call me your foe, did you expect me to restrain my posting. You don't restrain your posting. You attacked Steve and tried to use the death of his daughter as nail to drive through his heart to get at Steve, I used your wife to get at you "tit for tat". You made light of the death of a child, and said she should have been aborted and somehow he was responsible for her death, how anymore dispicable can you get, to attack the fact that someone has lost a child. You wife's sexuality pales in comparison. I have always said I would keep it on the net which I did, I never called you or sent you emails, prove otherwise, all information was obtained on the internet. I would be more upset at the people who call my wife a shemale without any proof. Nevertheless, I haven't seen a great number of posts harping on this one subject, but now that you have let it know that it bothers you, I am sure there will be an increase. Again your giving out too much information you should have known posting that list would result all kinds of off topic and disruptive to this NG post by the filth mongers you undertook those action with I believe to be mailce toward a poin t I believe you effected admited to when you you admited you "lashed out" you sought to harm in fit a pique at best or deliberate and preditated calualtion at worst No, it was only posted to refute your claims, how damaging can a wedding registry list be to someone, its not like you asked for a bunch of weird stuff. Nevertheless, this group has been disrupted for many years. the damge you have done me is beyond your power to retreive you are therefore at best a losse cannon proune to do me harm without any cause therefore I will attack you and contiue to seek to obscure you threads and post til i can assured you will not be in apostion to do me further harm if you decide (or fail to control yourself) and "lash out at me and my wife and good knows what ever memebr of y family or friends you vent your lashing on Again you are harping on one term as if it has great meaning, besides the word lash I could have used the word response, to me there are interchangable. I believe that no damage has been done, and without proof, I cannot believe you because of your pattern of lying. If you pout blood in shark infested water with swimers in the water some folks would called that Homocide of anyone that then dies in the next few minutes from sharck attack Well if the news groups postings kill your, I would really be interested of how words jumped of of the monitor and did you damage. What was your wife up all night crying that it got out? She should have protected herself, that was her responsibility. I think more than likely she probably chewed your ass for even engaging in this behavior and that is why you are so ****ed. Maybe you need a new outlet. ...... and once again for a third time attempt to post in this NG with engaging with you into this type of behavior. which is not ilegal or imoral It is in my opinion, a legitamate effort at self defense it is a techneque I have more effective than any other at my disposal I have told what will happen in various senarios and left the choice of how to proceed I sumerize them agin You can abandon the Dloyd Nick and thus go beyond my abilty to track your posting for a cintiuation of this treatment, which you claim to object to(that I point of fact believe you are geting exactly the response you want is yet matter) or you can continue to post as "Dloyd" and be subject to what you claim to see as harrassment and I see as proactive self defense aginst a person I preceive to my foe you have no legal rght under the guise of claiming to demand I cease to protect myself aginst attack by yourself and others My legal counsel says otherwise, but again he said if you have very little assest, its like beating a dead horse, why bother. But then again it is done, once again I tried to reason with you, be cordial, but your are an unreasonable/unstable person, I will continue to post under this nick because the first admendment gives me that right. That arguement has already been weighed by the US Supreme Court. You want to continue the behavior and your reign of harrassment, that is your option. As I have said before, I will not succumb to your demands of blackmail by threats, "do as I say or I will continue my attack", I have attempted to be reasonable but your behavior is blackmail, and so be it. Again you have lied I took you at your word which was disengage and for me to remove the blogs, and you would disengage, both of which I have complied, although not altogether just because you said . But like a blackmailer, you keep changing the terms asking for more and more, until you are satisfied, which appear to be never, next you will be asking for a cash payment, but I don't think you would be that stupid. So I will continue to post under my name that I have used for many years and you will continue to be like the little boy who cried wolf, and eventially what you post about me will be totally ignored and irrelvent, but useful for my purpose. So flame away! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Every single thread I start Mark thinks he has to crap on it. | Equipment | |||
Every single thread I start Mark thinks he has to crap on it. | Policy | |||
Every single thread I start Mark thinks he has to crap on it. | Swap | |||
Was - What's a CB...now RS pathetic. | Shortwave |