On Mon, 28 May 2007 15:33:26 -0400, wrote:
On Mon, 28 May 2007 00:49:56 -0500, "Not Roger" anon@anon wrote:

Toddie. Morally speaking, there are many of us who feel that your sick
cartoons of naked children are still just that. Child porn.

this is not the newsgruop for this discusion

You are not empowered to moderate this group, so get over it.

I happen to think your homophobia is sick I try not to go on about and
I don't try to stop you from posting something on topic

Your idea of what is "on topic" doesn't give you the right to thread
jack. Your attempts at censorship have resulted in an ongoing spew in
this group, and if you had any pride, you would be ashamed of yourself.

As to objecting to an amateur (N9OGL) posting cartoon pornography,
that's pretty much on topic, especially since it's the reason that he
lost two ISPs as other amateur operators reported him.

And it sure as hell isn't "homophobia" to object to such things, "Oh
Mark With a Chip on His Shoulder."

Judging by Todd's vile cartoons, posted both to his Google blog and
shared by him from his own server (and he once claimed to share his porn
over packet radio too), it is inevetable that people will suspect Todd
of being a closet pedophile. Nevertheless, Todd isn't disruptive.

You, on the other hand, are.

if you want RRAP to work you need to post something vaugely on radio a

We only need one major thing for RRAP to start to work: Your absence
from the group.

On May 28, 6:44 pm, "Chris" wrote:

Your attempts at censorship have resulted in an ongoing spew in
this group, and if you had any pride, you would be ashamed of yourself.

what effort at censorship is merely saying that the topic of Kiddy
porn is unrelated to HGam radio censorship now?

On 28 May 2007 16:05:22 -0700, an_old_friend wrote:
On May 28, 6:44 pm, "Chris" wrote:

Your attempts at censorship have resulted in an ongoing spew in
this group, and if you had any pride, you would be ashamed of yourself.

whatSTOMP!

STFU, fake Markie. Your forgeries are very badly done.

On May 28, 6:44 pm, "Chris" wrote:
On Mon, 28 May 2007 15:33:26 -0400, wrote:

As to objecting to an amateur (N9OGL) posting cartoon pornography,
that's pretty much on topic,

how does that make related to Radio Policy?

On May 28, 6:44 pm, "Chris" wrote:
On Mon, 28 May 2007 15:33:26 -0400, wrote:

Judging by Todd's vile cartoons, posted both to his Google blog and
shared by him from his own server

since when did cartoon become Ham radio?

On May 28, 6:44 pm, "Chris" wrote:
On Mon, 28 May 2007 15:33:26 -0400, wrote:

Todd isn't disruptive.

You, on the other hand, are.

disruptive how ?

why is asking you and your cabal to post on toic so disruptive?

yes I break up your constan efforts to enage in character assignation

you have responded massively by attacking me and then find I am not
vulnerable to your tactics and then you get ****ed


if you want RRAP to work you need to post something vaugely on radio a

We only need one major thing for RRAP to start to work: Your absence
from the group.

funny I was gone for 5 YEARS and RRAP was just going down hill