On Jun 13, 7:23 pm, Dloyd Lavies wrote:
On Jun 13, 5:27?pm, wrote:



On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:18:43 -0700, Dloyd Lavies

wrote:
On Jun 13, 2:45?pm, wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:16:45 -0700, Dloyd Lavies

wrote:
On Jun 12, 11:31?pm, wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:51:26 -0700, Dloyd Lavies

wrote:
On Jun 12, 10:40?pm, Queen Dumont of Perth Amboy
wrote:
No wonder ham radio is populated with so many aging bald-headed belly-
bulging bigots.
I saw em parade by on the Dayton Hamvention camera never seen such a
pathetic
looking bunch since the last model train and toy show I visited.

All true facts,

so do something about your pathetic nature dloyd

Mark I don't have a "pathetic" nature...

you certainly do have a pathetic nature

No only in your opinion, which doesn't count for anything

.........., first I don't go to Hamfests, I
can afford to buy new gear instead of purchasing the cockroach
infested **** that you buy,.......

I don't buy used gear

why is it that YOU claim some right to make make unsupported
accussation and insist others must have proof steve

First I am not Steve

porve it you are an anymous e I'll call yoyou what I like

I don't need to prove it, that information is on a need to know basis,
and you don't need to know. You just want to keep guessing hoping
that you will get it right one day, fat chance.

, But concerning accusations, you falsely
accuse people all the time without on shred of evidence, and you want
to talk of proof.

wrong again I never accuse anybody of anything without evidence

Bull, as an example, you accused me of hacking into accounts and
stealing data,
..

just your confession Dloyd

why you YOU ernage in beahvoir YOU state is imporper when done by
others?

What behavior do I engage in, that you can prove, that I say is
improper when done by others?

thread jacking using other people callsigns you were up in arms when I
used via typo another hams call and yet YOU mine

Dloyd

www.kb9rqz.blogspot.com-
with the proof being right there

other example exist such as you instistance that it is improper from
me to keep asking the same question when it is ignored and yet you did
quite a lot yesterday

On Jun 15, 8:43?am, an_old_friend wrote:
On Jun 13, 7:23 pm, Dloyd Lavies wrote:



On Jun 13, 5:27?pm, wrote:

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:18:43 -0700, Dloyd Lavies

wrote:
On Jun 13, 2:45?pm, wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 05:16:45 -0700, Dloyd Lavies

wrote:
On Jun 12, 11:31?pm, wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:51:26 -0700, Dloyd Lavies

wrote:
On Jun 12, 10:40?pm, Queen Dumont of Perth Amboy
wrote:
No wonder ham radio is populated with so many aging bald-headed belly-
bulging bigots.
I saw em parade by on the Dayton Hamvention camera never seen such a
pathetic
looking bunch since the last model train and toy show I visited.

All true facts,

so do something about your pathetic nature dloyd

Mark I don't have a "pathetic" nature...

you certainly do have a pathetic nature

No only in your opinion, which doesn't count for anything

.........., first I don't go to Hamfests, I
can afford to buy new gear instead of purchasing the cockroach
infested **** that you buy,.......

I don't buy used gear

why is it that YOU claim some right to make make unsupported
accussation and insist others must have proof steve

First I am not Steve

porve it you are an anymous e I'll call yoyou what I like

I don't need to prove it, that information is on a need to know basis,
and you don't need to know. You just want to keep guessing hoping
that you will get it right one day, fat chance.

, But concerning accusations, you falsely
accuse people all the time without on shred of evidence, and you want
to talk of proof.

wrong again I never accuse anybody of anything without evidence

Bull, as an example, you accused me of hacking into accounts and
stealing data,

.

just your confession Dloyd

No confession, just pure speculation on your part.

why you YOU ernage in beahvoir YOU state is imporper when done by
others?

What behavior do I engage in, that you can prove, that I say is
improper when done by others?

thread jacking using other people callsigns you were up in arms when I
used via typo another hams call and yet YOU mine

I haven't said a word about your using other people's calls, I could
care less. Calls don't mean anything on the internet. Why don't you go
out and find a post on RRAP where I said anything about you using
other people's calls. You know what, you can't, just another Mark
Morgan KB9RQZ lie, I just noticed something, good thing you don't work
CW, your call kind of sucks.

Dloyd

www.kb9rqz.blogspot.com

with the proof being right there

Another lie, because I didn't say a thing on RRAP about you using
another persons call. So using kb9rqz is perfectly within my right,
unless you do one thing, then I would have to give it up, but you
don't have the knowledge to do that one thing.

other example exist such as you instistance that it is improper from
me to keep asking the same question when it is ignored and yet you did
quite a lot yesterday

Big deal I did it once out of a year, you've done it so many times
I've lost count. Nevertheless, look how much you didn't like it, you
were squirming like a worm on a hook, and spamming like a rabid
monkey. So now you know why we don't like your behavior.

Look everybody, Mark doesn't like getting a taste of his own behavior,
and is whining about it, The irony.
It must suck being Mark.

"one usless Mark forging ahead"

Dloyd

www.kb9rqz.blogspot.com

On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:37:30 -0000, Dloyd Lavies
wrote:

On Jun 15, 8:43?am, an_old_friend wrote:
On Jun 13, 7:23 pm, Dloyd Lavies wrote:


just your confession Dloyd

No confession, just pure speculation on your part.

you confessed to being that posted the stien data I supose that could
have been a lie on your part

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

G

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Jun 17, 12:15?pm, wrote:

just your confession Dloyd

No confession, just pure speculation on your part.

you confessed to being that posted the stien data I supose that could
have been a lie on your part

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

G

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Really Mark. I would like to respond, but sometimes your posts are a
little hard to decipher.

Dloyd

www.kb9rqz.blogspot.com

"one useless Mark forging ahead"

On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:19:36 -0700, Dloyd Lavies
wrote:

On Jun 17, 12:15?pm, wrote:

just your confession Dloyd

No confession, just pure speculation on your part.

you confessed to being that posted the stien data I supose that could
have been a lie on your part

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

G

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Really Mark. I would like to respond, but sometimes your posts are a
little hard to decipher.

which is precisely the point Dloyd

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

G

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Jun 19, 12:08?pm, wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:19:36 -0700, Dloyd Lavies





wrote:
On Jun 17, 12:15?pm, wrote:

just your confession Dloyd

No confession, just pure speculation on your part.

you confessed to being that posted the stien data I supose that could
have been a lie on your part

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

G

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Really Mark. I would like to respond, but sometimes your posts are a
little hard to decipher.

which is precisely the point Dloyd

What that you are either too lazy to author a grammatically correct
sentence?

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

G

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:15:01 -0700, Dloyd Lavies
wrote:

On Jun 19, 12:08?pm, wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:19:36 -0700, Dloyd Lavies





wrote:
On Jun 17, 12:15?pm, wrote:

just your confession Dloyd

No confession, just pure speculation on your part.

you confessed to being that posted the stien data I supose that could
have been a lie on your part

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

G

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Really Mark. I would like to respond, but sometimes your posts are a
little hard to decipher.

which is precisely the point Dloyd

What that you are either too lazy to author a grammatically correct
sentence?

no Dloyd

iif you were inteligent and reading the NG you would know I am
authoring posts expressly crafted to all but impossible to respond to
in many case

where my natural tendecies tend to aid in that Mission I go with the
flow

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

G

--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

G

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com