On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 06:34:48 -0700, Dloyd Lavies
wrote:

On Jun 19, 10:34?pm, wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:19:24 -0700, Dloyd Lavies

wrote:
On Jun 19, 8:06?pm, wrote:
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/2007/06/m...tion-with.html

that is hteh gist of Dloyd is asserting that if someone places say an
ads in my name (or caitlyn in this case) that the perosns whoose name
is being falsely used is somehow respoble the criminal action of a
party or indeed parties unkown

Indeed If as has been threatened ads wil l palced in my name or
sactions with a check arriving in my mail box the money legaly is MINE
the sender has been vitumized but not by me

Are you on crack cocaine?

if you don't behave I don't repsond to your rants


8P


that is a response it is nonsense just an excuse for you threadjack
some more dloyd why do you do it

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

G

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com