Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
why can't Dloyd face facts and why does he thread jack this dicussion
On Jun 20, 12:14?pm, wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 06:45:52 -0700, Dloyd Lavies wrote: On Jun 19, 10:37?pm, wrote: http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/2007/06/m...tion-with.html that is hteh gist of Dloyd is asserting that if someone places say an ads in my name (or caitlyn in this case) that the perosns whoose name is being falsely used is somehow respoble the criminal action of a party or indeed parties unkown Indeed If as has been threatened ads wil l palced in my name or sactions with a check arriving in my mail box the money legaly is MINE the sender has been vitumized but not by me the sdame thing applies to Caitlyn the victum of being accused of being transgendered (i do not know or care wether is the case) "one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress" adams woger you are a Congress all in your own head http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/ G -- Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com "bruning through Dloyds jamming why do you claim recieveing a check in the maile is a crime asshole?" I never said receiving it was a crime. you certainly did imply that and you go on to state in this post What's wrong Mark, can't you read English. Nevertheless, it is a crime to keep the check and cash it, retard. nope, or more accurately it is not a crime for the reciever to keep and cash it it is crime but the criminal is the one that placed the flase ad or uction not the one set up to receive the proceeds, unless it can be proven the receiver KNOWS the chceck ill gotten IYO, is it a crime or not?, fyou say "nope, or more accurately it is not a crime for the reciever to keep and cash it it is crime. First you say "nope" then you say it is a crime. Make up your twisted mind. Nevetheless, most normal people know if they start receiving checks from people they don't know for no reason, something is awry, and know better then to cash the check, and that is the way the law views it as after the fact, and apparantly LE and the prosecuters in Wisconsin see it that way. So we will see what the court decides, better prepare to eat Crow, Mark. Dloyd "one useless Mark forging ahead" www.kb9rqz.blogspot.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
I claim spank on rrap | Policy | |||
stvevie the asshole contiues to be a lying asshole for rrap | Policy | |||
stvevie the asshole contiues to be a lying asshole for rrap | Policy |