"bruning through Dloyds jamming why do you claim recieveing a check in
the maile is a crime asshole?"

I never said receiving it was a crime.

you certainly did imply that and you go on to state in this post

What's wrong Mark, can't you
read English. Nevertheless, it is a crime to keep the check and cash
it, retard.

nope, or more accurately it is not a crime for the reciever to keep
and cash it it is crime but the criminal is the one that placed the
flase ad or uction not the one set up to receive the proceeds, unless
it can be proven the receiver KNOWS the chceck ill gotten

IYO, is it a crime or not?, fyou say "nope, or more accurately it is
not a crime for the reciever to keep and cash it it is crime. First
you say "nope" then you say it is a crime. Make up your twisted mind.

Nevetheless, most normal people know if they start receiving checks
from people they don't know for no reason, something is awry, and know
better then to cash the check, and that is the way the law views it as
after the fact, and apparantly LE and the prosecuters in Wisconsin see
it that way. So we will see what the court decides, better prepare to
eat Crow, Mark.

Dloyd

"one useless Mark forging ahead"

www.kb9rqz.blogspot.com


If you accept stolen money knowingly or not Mark, you are in posession of
stolen property.
That is a crime.
This is not unlike driving a stolen automobile that someone gives you. You
may not know it is stolen, but ignorance of the law is no excuse and you
will be charged with a crime.

Go ahead. Take the money. Please.

On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:31:57 -0500, "Mork" gayMark@chassell wrote:



"bruning through Dloyds jamming why do you claim recieveing a check in
the maile is a crime asshole?"

I never said receiving it was a crime.

you certainly did imply that and you go on to state in this post

What's wrong Mark, can't you
read English. Nevertheless, it is a crime to keep the check and cash
it, retard.

nope, or more accurately it is not a crime for the reciever to keep
and cash it it is crime but the criminal is the one that placed the
flase ad or uction not the one set up to receive the proceeds, unless
it can be proven the receiver KNOWS the chceck ill gotten

IYO, is it a crime or not?, fyou say "nope, or more accurately it is
not a crime for the reciever to keep and cash it it is crime. First
you say "nope" then you say it is a crime. Make up your twisted mind.

Nevetheless, most normal people know if they start receiving checks
from people they don't know for no reason, something is awry, and know
better then to cash the check, and that is the way the law views it as
after the fact, and apparantly LE and the prosecuters in Wisconsin see
it that way. So we will see what the court decides, better prepare to
eat Crow, Mark.

Dloyd

"one useless Mark forging ahead"

www.kb9rqz.blogspot.com


If you accept stolen money knowingly or not Mark, you are in posession of
stolen property.
That is a crime.
This is not unlike driving a stolen automobile that someone gives you.

well had out that issue sometime ago here in Michigan a person was
sold a stolen cars wih keys the charge against the vechile driver was
not even alowed to go to trail. he, the drive,r did have to surrender
the car of course a count of Frad was added to the list against the
man who stole it in the first place


In this case howver the issue is clearer the money would be stolen in
the first it would be freely given by it owner. posscession of
something given you by its rightfull owner is NOT ilegal

You
may not know it is stolen, but ignorance of the law is no excuse and you
will be charged with a crime.

perhaps charged yes I agree bt will the charge be allowed to come to
trail?


Go ahead. Take the money. Please.

sounds like you are threatening to do this

go for it


"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

G

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com