On 1 Jul 2003 14:31:19 GMT, Alun Palmer wrote:

We oughta have a pool on how long it takes The Congress and FCC to get
through the various levels of rubberstamping. My wild guess is no more
than a year from today.

I would think about the same, but surely we should each guess a particular
date, and the winner should be whoever is closest.

Put me down for March 15, 2004.

"Beware the Ides of March."

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane

In article , "Phil Kane"
writes:

On 1 Jul 2003 14:31:19 GMT, Alun Palmer wrote:

We oughta have a pool on how long it takes The Congress and FCC to get
through the various levels of rubberstamping. My wild guess is no more
than a year from today.

I would think about the same, but surely we should each guess a particular
date, and the winner should be whoever is closest.

Put me down for March 15, 2004.

"Beware the Ides of March."

HAW!

I'll take April 15, 2004.

Alun?

73 de Jim, N2EY

(N2EY) wrote in
:

In article , "Phil
Kane" writes:

On 1 Jul 2003 14:31:19 GMT, Alun Palmer wrote:

We oughta have a pool on how long it takes The Congress and FCC to
get through the various levels of rubberstamping. My wild guess is
no more than a year from today.

I would think about the same, but surely we should each guess a
particular date, and the winner should be whoever is closest.

Put me down for March 15, 2004.

"Beware the Ides of March."

HAW!

I'll take April 15, 2004.

Alun?

73 de Jim, N2EY


I already picked May 1, 2004

"Alun Palmer" wrote in message
...

Anyway, CW testing is all over bar the shouting. The unanimously agreed
language, now passed through all the commitee levels, makes it optional.
It just has to be nodded through at the plenary session. This allows those
countries mentioned, plus Germany to retain CW testing without it seeming
that it no longer relates to ITU rules, whilst also allowing every other
country to dump CW teasting.

Actually, the German radio administration support the deletion
of ITU rule S25.5. They are record that they will not continue
the domestic requirement.

It is the German IARU society that supports code exams.

Larry kc8epo

"Phil Kane" wrote in
.net:

On 1 Jul 2003 14:31:19 GMT, Alun Palmer wrote:

We oughta have a pool on how long it takes The Congress and FCC to
get through the various levels of rubberstamping. My wild guess is no
more than a year from today.

I would think about the same, but surely we should each guess a
particular date, and the winner should be whoever is closest.

Put me down for March 15, 2004.

"Beware the Ides of March."

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane



I'll say May 1, 2004. Any more takers?

"Phil Kane" wrote in message
.net...
On 1 Jul 2003 14:31:19 GMT, Alun Palmer wrote:

We oughta have a pool on how long it takes The Congress and FCC to get
through the various levels of rubberstamping. My wild guess is no more
than a year from today.

I would think about the same, but surely we should each guess a
particular
date, and the winner should be whoever is closest.

Put me down for March 15, 2004.

"Beware the Ides of March."
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane

Put me down for December 31, 2003.

"Clean desk rule"
Larry KC8EPO

Oh, what the hey! Put me down for September 13, 2003.

--
73 de Bert
WA2SI

"lk" wrote in message
...
"Phil Kane" wrote in message
.net...
On 1 Jul 2003 14:31:19 GMT, Alun Palmer wrote:

We oughta have a pool on how long it takes The Congress and FCC to
get
through the various levels of rubberstamping. My wild guess is no
more
than a year from today.

I would think about the same, but surely we should each guess a
particular
date, and the winner should be whoever is closest.

Put me down for March 15, 2004.

"Beware the Ides of March."
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane

Put me down for December 31, 2003.

"Clean desk rule"
Larry KC8EPO