Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:49:08 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote: Leo wrote: Jim, your debating style seems to be based almost entirely upon diversion, circular logic, word games, smokescreening and sidestepping of the main issue under discussion. ...and yours seems to be to set yourself up as an expert in debate while taking the view that we're somehow obligated to be even handed toward something which we find in poor taste. Not at all - you have missed the point entirely. My condolences. I expected better from the man who often speaks of principles and high standards of conduct in his posts. Jim is quite obviously acting on his principles in this matter. You think? ![]() The issue, as you are quite well aware, is your singling out of Kim in a list. And not creating a level playing field out of courtesy to her. Period. An issue which has been carefully avoided in all of your responses so far. What game are we playing which requires a level field? Kim wasn't being courteous to others in her choice of callsign. Perhaps you'll want to take her to task over it. She singled herself out in her choice of calls. And two wrongs somehow make a right? Of course she singled herself out with that call. So what? Does that make her a "bad person", somehow unfit for common courtesy, Dave? Now she has to live with the fallout. Some will give her a *wink* or a *chuckle*. Some will voice their disapproval. Full figured women live with the risk of fallout every day, Dave - it's a fact of life. ![]() Are you unable or unwilling to face up to this single issue? - or shall we all continue merrily down the garden path with you? You are fooling no one but yourself, Jim. "It has always been a peculiarity of the human race that it keeps two sets of morals in stock-the private and the real, and the public and the artificial." - Mark Twain So we're to believe that your private, real morals are better than those you've exhibited here. It seems that you've set yourself up here to defend bad taste. Nope - just the right of one individual to be treated equally by the others. Plain and simple. Dave K8MN 73, Leo |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Using a Pool Cage As an Antenna? | Antenna | |||
Use a Pool Cage As An Antenna? | Antenna | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | General | |||
REQ:latest Ham University with curent tech pool willing to share?/sell cheep | Equipment | |||
REQ:latest Ham University with curent tech pool willing to share?/sell cheep | Equipment |