Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 21:24:18 GMT, Carl R. Stevenson wrote:
I have reported that, in my over 32 years in the RF communications business, I have worked with MANY very competent engineers who would be interested in ham radio, but can't/won't be bothered with wasting their time jumping through a silly Morse code "hoop." Gee, I went to grad school, took all the courses that I thought I would like, didn't take any that I thought I wouldn't need, and refused to do a dissertation or thesis because such things were just a silly "hoop". Why didn't they give me a PhD ?? I deserved it. ggg these are folks that could pass a technical test well beyond the Extra. Do you doubt that, even without Morse proficiency, they could/would make good hams and could contribute to the service? Could they pass a snap test on operating procedure and regulations, possibly an oral challenge (here we go with grad school again) before that ogre, Examiner Kane? Don't get me wrong, Cecil - you read my input to the Restructuring Docket and you know that I was in favor of eliminating the code test. Just not for the reasons that you are proffering. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane |