Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Phil Kane" wrote in message .net... On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 02:37:44 GMT, Dee D. Flint wrote: No, I don't think it is outside of the FCC's authority. They have the power to modify the station license and operator license in just about anyway they see fit. Get it straight, Dee. This bozo was not operating under the color of any authorization (station or operator license or blanket rule authority) and is being treated as such. The fact that he holds an amateur license authorizing him to operate on amateur frequencies is meaningless at this stage. True enough but they chose to take the approach of ordering him to return the equipment to the unmodified state rather than simply just confiscating it, which they could have done. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
Keeping moisture out of 9913 type coax? | Antenna | |||
DRSI type 2 PCPA 4sal | General | |||
New Type of HF Shootout (antennas, pedestrian, bicycle) | Antenna | |||
Is the IC-V8 type accepted? | Equipment |