![]() |
How Ugly Can One Creep Be?
|
|
In article , ospam
(Extra class Paratransit Operator Sir Larry Roll) scribbled in a vain attempt at syncophancy: In article , (Steamy Garbageman) writes: Get real. Any astronaut is required to perform many, many tasks as part of their job...and that job is to be space crewfolk first, not "hams." Getting a no-code tech ham license is an easy task for them...do it once and a federal merit badge callsign is theirs to keep for a decade plus two or a shuttle burns up on reentry...whichever comes first. Leonard H Anderson, you are truly one of the most callous, cowardly and unrepetantly ugly people to ever enter USENET or any other public forum. Lennie: That WAS totally uncalled for. Your present and future credibility: ZERO. Poor baby. You don't understand that ALL astronauts have faced that possibility since manned spaceflight began. That is the unfortunate REALITY of present-day manned spaceflight. Well, we know that you can't stand reality. HOW DISGUSTING can one human being be...?!?! Steve: Unfortunately, I think our Lennie has just set a new threshold on "disgusting." Yes, failure to love, cherish, honor and obey morse code is terms for contempt by you, Roll. No problem. If you see a chance to slam a no-coder by standing on the garbage- man's shoulders, go for it! [and you did!] What a piece of work. Truly deserving of every ugly epithet I can think to "laud" you with and more. There hasn't been a prfanity created to adequately "describe" just how cold and disgusting that comment was. None that can be posted here, anyway. Why not? Is the mighty morseman offended by those who do not love, cherish, honor and obey morse code? If thine eye offend thee, cast it out. We don't know that the deaths of the Columbia (or Challenge) crews wasn't long, lingering, and painful. They may have been well conscious long enough to know they were doomed, and had nothing to do to prevent it. Unfortunately, wishing the same on Lennie won't do, either. Lennie has proven himself to be beyond contempt. Don't fall into the same pit he did. Roll, you large bag of fat wind, you've never worked on ANY space project, NEVER shook hands with any astronaut and look them in the eye (I did...John Young is a nice, quiet sort, not very tall...Bob Crippen is taller, more outgoing...both rode the air-drop Enterprize as well as the first STS manned spaceflight). They understood the risks they were taking. By STS 51J the press and public had colored your thinking such that spaceflight was all just a safe, jolly jaunt in space. You've never known anything about manned spaceflight so you project your fantasies as if they were final judgement. You know NOTHING about any high-tech human endeavor. You want very much to "identify" with things you've never participated in, talk about it like you were really "there" but you never were. You've never done any military 24/7 radio communications nor any civilian professional radio communications and you feel "superior" in both morals and ethics over all "no-coders." If you want to be a syncophant to the Garbageman, go right ahead. When anyone wants an ideal role-model for the US Amateur Extra radio amateur, they can always go to you or the Garbageman. :-) LHA |
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , ospam (Extra class Paratransit Operator Sir Larry Roll) scribbled in a vain attempt at syncophancy: In article , (Steamy Garbageman) writes: Get real. Any astronaut is required to perform many, many tasks as part of their job...and that job is to be space crewfolk first, not "hams." Getting a no-code tech ham license is an easy task for them...do it once and a federal merit badge callsign is theirs to keep for a decade plus two or a shuttle burns up on reentry...whichever comes first. Leonard H Anderson, you are truly one of the most callous, cowardly and unrepetantly ugly people to ever enter USENET or any other public forum. Lennie: That WAS totally uncalled for. Your present and future credibility: ZERO. Poor baby. You don't understand that ALL astronauts have faced that possibility since manned spaceflight began. That is the unfortunate REALITY of present-day manned spaceflight. Well, we know that you can't stand reality. THIS is reality: You're the singularly most disgusting scumbag I have ever had the misfortune of "meeting". You're callous, selfish, and most of all one hateful shell of a human being. HOW DISGUSTING can one human being be...?!?! Steve: Unfortunately, I think our Lennie has just set a new threshold on "disgusting." Yes, failure to love, cherish, honor and obey morse code is terms for contempt by you, Roll. No problem. No, Scumbag, don't een TRY to shift this to anything even remorely tied to Amateur Radio, let alone Morse Code. This is about how UGLY and SCURRILOUS one person can get. If you see a chance to slam a no-coder by standing on the garbage- man's shoulders, go for it! [and you did!] What a piece of work. Truly deserving of every ugly epithet I can think to "laud" you with and more. There hasn't been a prfanity created to adequately "describe" just how cold and disgusting that comment was. None that can be posted here, anyway. Why not? Is the mighty morseman offended by those who do not love, cherish, honor and obey morse code? This isn't about Morse Code, Scumbag. It's about the callousness of your "reentry" comments. If thine eye offend thee, cast it out. You shouldn't tempt me, Scumbag. We don't know that the deaths of the Columbia (or Challenge) crews wasn't long, lingering, and painful. They may have been well conscious long enough to know they were doomed, and had nothing to do to prevent it. Unfortunately, wishing the same on Lennie won't do, either. Lennie has proven himself to be beyond contempt. Don't fall into the same pit he did. Roll, you large bag of fat wind, you've never worked on ANY space project, NEVER shook hands with any astronaut and look them in the eye (I did...John Young is a nice, quiet sort, not very tall...Bob Crippen is taller, more outgoing...both rode the air-drop Enterprize as well as the first STS manned spaceflight). I got ya beat by a handful, including one Senator Astronaut. They understood the risks they were taking. By STS 51J the press and public had colored your thinking such that spaceflight was all just a safe, jolly jaunt in space. You've never known anything about manned spaceflight so you project your fantasies as if they were final judgement. You know NOTHING about any high-tech human endeavor. So that allows you to make such heinous comments? You "shook hands" with some astronauts and swept the floors for a couple of space contractors, now you have carte blanche to be sadistic at their expense? You want very much to "identify" with things you've never participated in, talk about it like you were really "there" but you never were. You've never done any military 24/7 radio communications nor any civilian professional radio communications and you feel "superior" in both morals and ethics over all "no-coders." If you want to be a syncophant to the Garbageman, go right ahead. When anyone wants an ideal role-model for the US Amateur Extra radio amateur, they can always go to you or the Garbageman. :-) Nice try, SCUMBAG. This was the event that will bury any chance you ever had of being accepted in ANY Amateur Radio venue. Get your correspondence course shrink wife to explain it to you. Steve Robeson |
Radio Amateur KC2HMZ wrote in message . ..
However, the reference to shuttles burning up on reentry was a poor choice of words. You have to understand the liar behind the postings, John. Leonard H Anderson is one of the most prolific, hateful, spite-filled pathological liars to ever darken USENET. That he can even consider, let alone publish, the hateful and just plain mean-spirited trash he just let out and then try to "justify" it in some Morse Code related rhetoric is absoulety shameful. I thought his attempts to embellish his Army "career" record by assosciating himself with Soldiers who died 3 years before he was even sworn in was disgusting. Lennie puts the "scum" in scumbag, that's for sure. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
|
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (Steamy the Garbage Man) wrote in a fit of distemper: "Distemper"..?!?! That's cute. (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... Get real. Any astronaut is required to perform many, many tasks as part of their job...and that job is to be space crewfolk first, not "hams." Getting a no-code tech ham license is an easy task for them...do it once and a federal merit badge callsign is theirs to keep for a decade plus two or a shuttle burns up on reentry...whichever comes first. Leonard H Anderson, you are truly one of the most callous, cowardly and unrepetantly ugly people to ever enter USENET or any other public forum. Gosh, you'd better write AOL post-haste and have me banished! If it would work, I would. I am not as low-down as you, Lennie, and I can bear up far more graciously than you can to examination. HOW DISGUSTING can one human being be...?!?! Now now, quit looking in the mirror when posting, okay? I am not the one who needs to hide behind KIA's or make vile comments about American Astronauts, Scumbag...That's YOUR schtick. What a piece of work. Truly deserving of every ugly epithet I can think to "laud" you with and more. There hasn't been a prfanity created to adequately "describe" just how cold and disgusting that comment was. Go for it, garbageman. Exhaust your entire collection of epithets and cursewords. It may do you good psychologically...you surely aren't getting any professional help on your distemper tantrums. I am not the one who needs them, Lennie. How's your correspondence school trained wife take this...Living with a creep who hides behind skirts and lies? "Scumbag" is an understatment. "Putz" only scratches the top. Oy gevalt! Dey got a shtetl in TN? :-) You try to embellish your own "reputation" on the graves of American KIA's, then you completely disgrace and humilate the graves of seven men and women who, regardless of nationality, died what can only be assumed to have been a horrific death in the pursuit of science Tsk, tsk, tsk. No end to your hatred and disgust, is there? For you? No. It's an embarrasment to me as a Veteran to have creeps like you who can use the Constitution as a cloak for such behaviour. That you can further abuse it to defile the memory of those seven brave souls who died on Columbia is horrific. What an utterly foul, irrelevent and truly puny shadow of a human being you are. When YOUR death comes, I can only hope that, unlike those seven brave souls, that it is long, lingering and painful, and that you remain sufficiently aware of your circumstances to appreciate it all. Creep. There ya go, Dr. Killgore, ER hero and role-model for medical professionals the world over! You MUST learn not to stick your hand in the Sharps box so much. You should take up a nice, restful hobby...maybe stamp collecting. You can always lick stamps whenever you want...you can't lick your newsgroup opponents with curses and wishes for death. Remember that "9 ounces" works both ways...ready on the left? Ready on the right? Ready on the firing line? You have 20 seconds. Now take those meds like a good patient... Nice try...still comes way short of the mark. Your die is cast, Lennie, and it says "LOSER" all over it. Get shrinky-poo to give you an hour of couch time tonight, if she can stand the stench. LHA (L)ying (H)am-baiting (A)ntagonist. Steve Robeson |
In article , Radio Amateur KC2HMZ
writes: An astronaut/ham's license is renewable for the life of the astronaut/ham. So is any other ham's license. Once a ham becomes a silent key, responsibility for licensing him or her passes to a higher authority (who is a ham and has just bestowed the ultimate license upgrade to the newly deceased - the privileges are unparallelled, but the licensing requirements are rather steep - although no demonstration of Morse proficiency is required, the written test is reputed to be a real killer). However, the reference to shuttles burning up on reentry was a poor choice of words. As to your last sentence, John, you would be right only in discounting certain individuals in here. This thread got started by one who is obsessed with throwing any kind of garbage at myself for the slightest reason...or as manufactured garbage through the use of inference, misdirection, or outright malicious quoting out of context. As one who has been IN the aerospace industry and actually worked ON spaceflight hardware (including man-rated), I'm in the category of ardent fans of the overall effort and certain honor the men and women who have been chosen as astronauts...and cosmonauts. A problem with the ordinary public is that they consider space flight "safe," just like a long plane ride. It is most definitely NOT so. Every single manned flight is a high-risk activity. That it has appeared safe for many successful flights is due largely to thousands of non-astronauts who did the engineering, design, fabrication of the vehicles and payloads. The public is largely ignorant of them...at best only knowing the ones around consoles at the MSFC Mission Control room. Still, each and every space flight is not without risk today. The tragedy of Columbia proved that very unfortunately. Back when Grissom, White, and Chaffee lost their lives in a ground capsule test fire for Apollo, I was working on unmanned space flight payloads...every single one of us in the clean room were saddened on hearing of the event. At that same facility earlier, some of us saw the unedited film of the Gemini-Agena docking flight, the one where a stuck-open manuevering thruster caused a high-rate double degree of freedom rolling. Command pilot Neil Armstrong managed to shut it down, but not before the roll rate had gotten very severe. Armstrong and David Scott could have perished on that flight but managed to manuever just enough to splashdown in the Pacific well away from the intended landing site. Five astronauts and one cosmonaut (Yuri Gagarin) died in aircraft flights. "Ordinary" air flight is supposed to be safe...but it is not without risk. Of the seven who died in Challenger (STS-51J), few know the names of the major crew. Judith Resnick is honored by the IEEE (she was a member) by having her name on an award. It was to be Judy's second mission in space...also commander Scobee and specialist Onizuka. Challenger never reached outer space, exploding a mere 73 seconds after lift-off. Before you get involved in castigating someone, consider carefully who started this thread and the manner in which it was written. Like tens of thousands of others, I honor ALL the names of men and women who have gone in space...even those who have joined the space endeavor knowing full well what their risks are. Leonard H. Anderson retired (from regular hours) electronic engineer person |
|
|
|
|
ospam (Larry Roll K3LT) wrote in message ...
In article , (Brian) writes: There can be no doubt that you experience psychosomatic illness when you expose yourself to Len's comments. Your reactions are quite severe. It would be prudent to stop reading them. Brian: That's good advice -- and "Kim" could be just as easily substituted for "Len." 73 de Larry, K3LT I don't think Mrs Anderson goes that way, nor Kim's husband. |
|
|
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(Brian) wrote in message . com... You called Len a liar. You were wrong. Be strong and face up to it. Brian, Lennie IS a liar in more ways than one. How many ways are there to be a liar? In this case he's an insensitive creep who used a horrific tragedy to try and "make a point" about Amateur Radio licensing and the "Ham in Space" program. Being insensitive is called "being insensitive," not lying. I am not wrong. His track record of pathological mistruths is clear and well documented. In this there is no error. You are clearly wrong. Did the shuttle tragedy not occur? Have the astronauts not perished? That you so adamantly support and defend him can only mean that YOU support lying and insensitivity as legitimate forms of communication. Ahh. I disagree with you and so I now support lying? Now you're wrong again. That makes YOU as equally disgusting and foul as he...perhaps even more so since his conduct may be due to some mental health abboration and yours MUST be a voluntary choice of actions. Typical liberal tactic. No, Brain... It's "Brian." No need for me to "face up to it" here. But there is. You're delusional, and it's time to get a grip. Lennie has created the path he's following. He would have to be ahead of himself to create that path. That you choose to drop in behind him only means you LIKE the stench and the reputation of being associated with a liar and a creep. Is that what it means? That's for YOU to "face up to". Steve Robeson, K4YZ I'm sure you have a nice health plan working as a nurse. Go get some help. |
|
"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote in message
... In article , (Brian) writes: Brian: That's good advice -- and "Kim" could be just as easily substituted for "Len." 73 de Larry, K3LT I don't think Mrs Anderson goes that way, nor Kim's husband. Now, talk about two long-suffering people! Mrs. Anderson and Mr. Walker surely must be headed for sainthood! 73 de Larry, K3LT Yep, that really looks ham radio related to me, Larry...NOT. Gosh, I didn't even have to do a search to prove you wrong. Kim W5TIT --- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net Complaints to |
(Brian) wrote in message . com...
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... (Brian) wrote in message . com... Being insensitive is called "being insensitive," not lying. I don't know what's worse...An callous putz like Lennie who makes light of people who died a horrific death, or a milktoast pantywaist putz such as yourself who tries to defend him. But I guess you both fill a need...If it weren't for the callous, the insensitive and the dishonest, what would we have to gauge the rest of society by...?!?! We need creeps like the two of you to appreciate the sensitive, the thoughtful and honest by. I am not wrong. His track record of pathological mistruths is clear and well documented. In this there is no error. You are clearly wrong. I am sure you'd like to think so. I am not. Did the shuttle tragedy not occur? Have the astronauts not perished? It did. It does NOT negate the fact that Lennie used it in a disgusting manner to "make a point" over something completely unrelated, nor does it negate the fact that he's a documented pathological liar. That you so adamantly support and defend him can only mean that YOU support lying and insensitivity as legitimate forms of communication. Ahh. I disagree with you and so I now support lying? It's not "disagree(ing)" with me, Brain...It's trying to defend Lennie that does that. Now you're wrong again. Nope. You defend Lennie's use of mistruth and callous insensitivities. That makes you part-and-parcel of his misdeeds. Some game of "Follow the Leader" you play, Brain. That makes YOU as equally disgusting and foul as he...perhaps even more so since his conduct may be due to some mental health abboration and yours MUST be a voluntary choice of actions. Typical liberal tactic. I am quite a long-ways away from being "liberal" anything. No, Brain... It's "Brian." Whatever. No need for me to "face up to it" here. But there is. You're delusional, and it's time to get a grip. Facts are facts, and the facts are you are trying to defend the indefensible. Now who's delusional? Lennie has created the path he's following. He would have to be ahead of himself to create that path. Not when you're just going around in circles. Lennie does that well. It's one of the few things he DOES do well. That you choose to drop in behind him only means you LIKE the stench and the reputation of being associated with a liar and a creep. Is that what it means? Fraid so. That's for YOU to "face up to". I'm sure you have a nice health plan working as a nurse. Go get some help. I am not the one defending a documented pathological liar and insensitive creep. That's your schtick, for whatever reason you feel it appropriate. You've shown your colors here, Brain. Thanks for making my point for me...Again. Steve, K4YZ |
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(Brian) wrote in message . com... (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... (Brian) wrote in message . com... Being insensitive is called "being insensitive," not lying. I don't know what's worse...An callous putz like Lennie who makes light of people who died a horrific death, or a milktoast pantywaist putz such as yourself who tries to defend him. Oh, gee, what could be worse? Maybe you need to call in some help to make that big decision. Maybe they'll help you get back on your meds. And quit reading Len's posts. They obviously have an ruinous effect on you. |
|
(Brian) wrote in message . com...
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... Being insensitive is called "being insensitive," not lying. I don't know what's worse...An callous putz like Lennie who makes light of people who died a horrific death, or a milktoast pantywaist putz such as yourself who tries to defend him. Oh, gee, what could be worse? Being a rapist...child molester...spousal abuser... Maybe you need to call in some help to make that big decision. Maybe they'll help you get back on your meds. You and Lennie keep insisting on this. I am sure you wish it were true, but it seems it's your only "defense" against being held up to public scrutiny for your own shortcomings. It doesn't work. The problem is that you and Leonard are you own worst enemies. The virtual slapping around you take in this forum is fueled by your own ramblings. And quit reading Len's posts. They obviously have an ruinous effect on you. I don't tolerate liars, nor do I tolerate the callous and rude. Lennie is all of that, and you "defend" him...So guess where that leaves you? Steve, K4YZ |
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(Brian) wrote in message . com... (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... Being insensitive is called "being insensitive," not lying. I don't know what's worse...An callous putz like Lennie who makes light of people who died a horrific death, or a milktoast pantywaist putz such as yourself who tries to defend him. Oh, gee, what could be worse? Being a rapist...child molester...spousal abuser... You said you didn't know what was worse with respect to me, so now you're calling me a "rapist...child molester...spousal abuser...?" Merely because I think you grossly overreact to each and every post Len makes? Maybe you need to call in some help to make that big decision. Maybe they'll help you get back on your meds. You and Lennie keep insisting on this. Steve, it's the only logical conclusion one could draw from your insane postings. I am sure you wish it were true, It obviously is. but it seems it's your only "defense" against being held up to public scrutiny for your own shortcomings. You are the Avenging Angel of rrap? It doesn't work. Then apparently you have not been diagnosed by a licensed professional. See if you can get some dealer samples at least. The problem is that you and Leonard are you own worst enemies. The virtual slapping around you take in this forum is fueled by your own ramblings. I think the "slapping around" that I take is from wacko's such as yourself, and it would be forthcoming simply because I disagree with you. Some, such as DICK and Kelly, range from merely curt replies to rude name calling. You're off the scale. And quit reading Len's posts. They obviously have an ruinous effect on you. I don't tolerate liars, nor do I tolerate the callous and rude. I don't see you attacking WA8ULX. You believed his story of how he tested for Extra, and he is callous and rude. Lennie is all of that, and you "defend" him...So guess where that leaves you? So far, I haven't defended Len. I merely said that you were wrong about the shuttle tragedy. It really did occur. And I've suggested that you refrain from reading Len's posts in the hope that you'll be able to sleep at night. Now you imply that I'm a rapist... Get some help. 73, Brian |
(Brian) wrote in message . com...
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... (Brian) wrote in message . com... (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... Oh, gee, what could be worse? Being a rapist...child molester...spousal abuser... You said you didn't know what was worse with respect to me, so now you're calling me a "rapist...child molester...spousal abuser...?" Merely because I think you grossly overreact to each and every post Len makes? I am sure you do, considering your nose is so far up his 6 o'clock orifice, I am sure you have to blow your nose every time he passes wind. Maybe you need to call in some help to make that big decision. Maybe they'll help you get back on your meds. You and Lennie keep insisting on this. Steve, it's the only logical conclusion one could draw from your insane postings. Brain, there is noting "logical" about lying and callous indiscretion that you and your buddy favor. Your other attempts to twist what was clearly said in archived posts is likewise illogical. I am sure you wish it were true, It obviously is. To you, perhaps. But then it seems it's just you and Lennie in one corner and everyone else in the other. Even those who also favor your basic views on Code testing do their best to distance themselves from you and Lennie. Don't you wonder why? but it seems it's your only "defense" against being held up to public scrutiny for your own shortcomings. You are the Avenging Angel of rrap? Do YOU think I am? Then I must be. Otherwise, I am just another Amateur licensee who doesn't like some lookie-loo making irresponsible and untruthful statements about something of which I have first hand knowledge. It doesn't work. Then apparently you have not been diagnosed by a licensed professional. See if you can get some dealer samples at least. There's nothing to be "diagnosed", Brain. Other than my unwillingness to let go of Lennie's tail, no one can argue with the validity of MY statements, nor can they deny the arrogance and inaccuracies of Lennie's...And yours, for that matter. The problem is that you and Leonard are you own worst enemies. The virtual slapping around you take in this forum is fueled by your own ramblings. I think the "slapping around" that I take is from wacko's such as yourself, and it would be forthcoming simply because I disagree with you. Some, such as DICK and Kelly, range from merely curt replies to rude name calling. You're off the scale. I am sure you think I am. But then you also can't delineate the difference between "authorization" and "acceptance", nor can you validate any of the assertions you've made vis-a-vis your "credit" as a "DX" operator. Many people here disagree with me, and I they...but the basic fiber of the exchanges don't degrade to this point because we can agree to disagree. You and Lennie can't/won't do that. And quit reading Len's posts. They obviously have an ruinous effect on you. I don't tolerate liars, nor do I tolerate the callous and rude. I don't see you attacking WA8ULX. You believed his story of how he tested for Extra, and he is callous and rude. Brucie is in the killfile. Brucie is KNOWN to suffer various mental abborations, and his rantings are so childish and idiotic that they are clearly that to even the casual reader. He's an idiot-bar-none, always was, always will be. Lennie is all of that, and you "defend" him...So guess where that leaves you? So far, I haven't defended Len...(SNIP) Sure you have. Read back the last 15 messages in this thread alone. I merely said that you were wrong about the shuttle tragedy. It really did occur. Sure it did. But you have somehow insinuated that by having identified Lennie as a liar I am saying he lies about this. I did not. I said he's a callous, insensitive creep. This was but yet one more a-burke-tion of what was said in order to create a fight in which you fancy yourself as being on top. And I've suggested that you refrain from reading Len's posts in the hope that you'll be able to sleep at night. I sleep fine, Brain. What would make you think otherwise? Now you imply that I'm a rapist... There YOU go trying to make an insinuation that just isn't true. Get some help. Take your own advice. Soon. 73...(SNIP) Insincerity seems to be your forte, Brain. Steve, K4YZ |
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(Brian) wrote in message . com... (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... (Brian) wrote in message . com... (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... Oh, gee, what could be worse? Being a rapist...child molester...spousal abuser... You said you didn't know what was worse with respect to me, so now you're calling me a "rapist...child molester...spousal abuser...?" Merely because I think you grossly overreact to each and every post Len makes? I am sure you do, considering your nose is so far up his 6 o'clock orifice, I am sure you have to blow your nose every time he passes wind. You sure are a nice guy, Steve. What were you saying about having to smite out the callous and crude? Next time you bolt on your Avenging Angel wings, look for your own name on the list. Maybe you need to call in some help to make that big decision. Maybe they'll help you get back on your meds. You and Lennie keep insisting on this. Steve, it's the only logical conclusion one could draw from your insane postings. Brain, there is noting "logical" about lying and callous indiscretion that you and your buddy favor. Your other attempts to twist what was clearly said in archived posts is likewise illogical. No twisting. You just went off on a rant and forgot what the subject was. Very easy to do when you lose self-control. I am sure you wish it were true, It obviously is. To you, perhaps. But then it seems it's just you and Lennie in one corner and everyone else in the other. Even those who also favor your basic views on Code testing do their best to distance themselves from you and Lennie. You might want to join them. Don't you wonder why? No. but it seems it's your only "defense" against being held up to public scrutiny for your own shortcomings. You are the Avenging Angel of rrap? Do YOU think I am? Then I must be. Otherwise, I am just another Amateur licensee who doesn't like some lookie-loo making irresponsible and untruthful statements about something of which I have first hand knowledge. What was untruthful about the shuttle tragedy? It doesn't work. Then apparently you have not been diagnosed by a licensed professional. See if you can get some dealer samples at least. There's nothing to be "diagnosed", Brain. But there is. You're wacko for Len. Other than my unwillingness to let go of Lennie's tail, no one can argue with the validity of MY statements, nor can they deny the arrogance and inaccuracies of Lennie's...And yours, for that matter. I just did, and successfully, I might add. Unless you can come up with some proof that the shuttle tragedy didn't occur, and that the astronauts are safe and can renew their amateur licenses when they are within the renewal period. You've got your work cut out for you. Better get busy. The problem is that you and Leonard are you own worst enemies. The virtual slapping around you take in this forum is fueled by your own ramblings. I think the "slapping around" that I take is from wacko's such as yourself, and it would be forthcoming simply because I disagree with you. Some, such as DICK and Kelly, range from merely curt replies to rude name calling. You're off the scale. I am sure you think I am. I'm sure of it. But then you also can't delineate the difference between "authorization" and "acceptance", nor can you validate any of the assertions you've made vis-a-vis your "credit" as a "DX" operator. I've operated DX from Korea, Guam, and Somalia. I didn't need your approval, then or now. Many people here disagree with me, and I they...but the basic fiber of the exchanges don't degrade to this point because we can agree to disagree. You and Lennie can't/won't do that. Then there's definitely something up between you and Len. You cannot ignore even one of his postings. You've got to start a new thread with almost every response, with eyes rolled back capitalization to the hilt. Get a grip and get some help. And quit reading Len's posts. They obviously have an ruinous effect on you. I don't tolerate liars, nor do I tolerate the callous and rude. I don't see you attacking WA8ULX. You believed his story of how he tested for Extra, and he is callous and rude. Brucie is in the killfile. Brucie is KNOWN to suffer various mental abborations, and his rantings are so childish and idiotic that they are clearly that to even the casual reader. He's an idiot-bar-none, always was, always will be. So put on your Avenging Angel wings and destroy him. You said that you don't tolerate liars, the callous, and the crude. So get to work, OR... just ignore Len the way you are able to ignore Bruce. And by the way, how is it that you can see "mental abberations" in Bruce that you cannot recognize in yourself? Lennie is all of that, and you "defend" him...So guess where that leaves you? So far, I haven't defended Len...(SNIP) Sure you have. Read back the last 15 messages in this thread alone. This isn't about Len. This is about your insane behavior. You said Len was a liar in a reply about the shuttle tragedy. You were wrong. I merely said that you were wrong about the shuttle tragedy. It really did occur. Sure it did. But you have somehow insinuated that by having identified Lennie as a liar I am saying he lies about this. No insinuation. Go back and reread your post. I did not. Oh, but you did. You called him a liar. I said he's a callous, insensitive creep. Yes, you did. But first you called him a liar. Its plainly there in your post. This was but yet one more a-burke-tion of what was said in order to create a fight in which you fancy yourself as being on top. Look, Steve. You crapped your pants. Just excuse yourself and go clean up. Then put Len in your "kill file" as you've done with Bruce. You'll feel a lot better afterward. And I've suggested that you refrain from reading Len's posts in the hope that you'll be able to sleep at night. I sleep fine, Brain. What would make you think otherwise? Now you imply that I'm a rapist... There YOU go trying to make an insinuation that just isn't true. You're the one who said you couldn't decide what would be worse. When pressed, you said "rapist...child molester...spouse abuser.." Fine. Look, go ahead and take your parting shot. I'm out of this thread, but I reserve the right point out your poor behavior in your next new thread. Brian |
|
|
In article , Radio Amateur KC2HMZ
writes: John: I see you live in Tonawanda, NY. I am a former Western New Yorker, having been raised in the town of Alden. I wonder if you know my good friend Pete Liaros, K2RSK? Of course I do, he's very active on the airwaves in this area's 2m/440 repeaters and also operates mobile HF CW to boot. Also a fixture at hamfests and the odd club meeting, too. John: Yes, indeed. I was one of the first to see the nifty HF antenna mount he got made for his '94 Mercury Grand Marquis. I think we had breakfast the day after it was done. I saw him last fall, and he still had that car! If so, next time you see him or talk to him on a local repeater, let him know you know me and I'm sure he'll tell you all about me and how we met on 10-meters over 20 years ago! You can hook up with him on 40m CW of course, but if you really want to surprise him, get EchoLink and pop onto the WB2JPQ interlink system here in western NY. Dick has his 146.835 machine connected to the Echolink network. That machine's part of a system of linked repeaters that covers most of this end of the state (from the Pennsylvania line to well east of Rochester...farther when the temperature inversions along the south shore of Lake Ontario duct the signals from the Rochester area machine up into the Watertown area), and Pete is frequently on one of the linked machines, when he isn't on the BARRA link system chatting with Ted, WA2HKS. I'll have to check that EchoLink thing out. All I know about it is how to spell it. I occasionally E-mail to Pete, but he doesn't seem to read his mail that often, or reply, for that matter. Whenever I visit in the WNY area, I try to have breakfast with Peter -- pehaps you could join us sometime! Then there is the matter of that roast beef sandwich you still have coming...though I suppose if you'd prefer a comparably priced breakfast... Breakfast or lunch, it matters not to me! A Beef on Weck and a glass of Genny would be a great way to enjoy some ham camaraderie. Shoot for a Tuesday or Wednesday morning. Those are my two days off work. Other days I work from 5AM to 1:30PM, so unless you're into eating really late breakfasts, or want to make it lunch instead (sending us back into roast beef territory)........... OK, great. Like I said before, my next visit to the WNY area will most likely be over the Thanksgiving holiday, if I can manage to take some personal days off. I've pretty much given up on being home for Christmas, due to the tendency to be forced to spend an inordinate amount of time behind the snow blower! If I were to ever move again, I think I'd just go to various places and walk around carrying a snow shovel. As soon as someone asked me, "What the heck is THAT?" -- I'd stop! 73 de Larry, K3LT |
On 22 Jul 2003 05:47:23 GMT, ospam (Larry Roll K3LT)
wrote in regards to mutual acquaintance K2RSK Yes, indeed. I was one of the first to see the nifty HF antenna mount he got made for his '94 Mercury Grand Marquis. I think we had breakfast the day after it was done. I saw him last fall, and he still had that car! Last time I saw him (this summer) he was driving it down I-290 East just before the I-90 split, chatting with someone on the WNYDXA repeater and wondering who he'd just passed with four antennas on top of a van (which was me). :-) I'll have to check that EchoLink thing out. All I know about it is how to spell it. I occasionally E-mail to Pete, but he doesn't seem to read his mail that often, or reply, for that matter. John Taylor, K1RFD, created it. Its use is limited to licensed radio amateurs only. You can download it, entirely for free, at the following website: http://www.echolink.org Echolink uses voice-over-IP. You can use your computer and Internet connection to get a repeater anywhere in the world if that repeater is linked in via the Internet. Ham stations, including repeaters in different parts of the world can be linked via Echolink as well. As an example, I've talked to a ham in California using my 2m mobile rig while driving downthe road here in New York. The repeater I was on was connected to Echolink at the time, and so was the repeater in California that the other ham was using. You can also set up a link on your station at home (on a simplex frequency) and use your handheld to access the link. You might expect no-code Techs to gravitate to this as a means of contacting DX without HF privileges - and they do - but many longtime hams with HF privileges use it too, particularly guys that have retired and moved away and use Echolink to keep in touch with the locals from "back home" - especially true of guys who are now living in condos down in Florida and aren't permitted to erect HF antennas. Breakfast or lunch, it matters not to me! A Beef on Weck and a glass of Genny would be a great way to enjoy some ham camaraderie. I might opt for a soft drink instead of the Genny, but other than that it sounds good to me. Be sure and let me know ahead of time next time you plan to head up this way, and we'll plan a get-together. (For those not familiar with Western new York culture, Genny is a locally brewed beer that's quite popular in these here parts) OK, great. Like I said before, my next visit to the WNY area will most likely be over the Thanksgiving holiday, if I can manage to take some personal days off. Better yet! Gives me a perfect excuse to eat something besides turkey. I like turkey, but usually have had more than enough of it by Saturday. I've pretty much given up on being home for Christmas, due to the tendency to be forced to spend an inordinate amount of time behind the snow blower! Snow blower!? You ain't a "real" Western New Yorker! If you were, you'd use a shovel like they used to do a hundred years ago. It's still a perfectly efficient and viable means of snow removal. Anybody who uses a snow blower is just plain lazy. :-) If I were to ever move again, I think I'd just go to various places and walk around carrying a snow shovel. As soon as someone asked me, "What the heck is THAT?" -- I'd stop! Just make sure the guy who asks is a local resident and not some tourist from somewhere in the Mojave Desert who's just visiting! Or one of those lazy types who's just interested in clearing the driveway and has never even owned a shovel like a "real" Western New Yorker. 73 DE John, KC2HMZ |
Radio Amateur KC2HMZ wrote in message . ..
On 22 Jul 2003 05:47:23 GMT, ospam (Larry Roll K3LT) Breakfast or lunch, it matters not to me! A Beef on Weck and a glass of Genny would be a great way to enjoy some ham camaraderie. I might opt for a soft drink instead of the Genny, but other than that it sounds good to me. Be sure and let me know ahead of time next time you plan to head up this way, and we'll plan a get-together. (For those not familiar with Western new York culture, Genny is a locally brewed beer that's quite popular in these here parts) Rochester, to be exact. Gawd, I miss that stuff. Red hots, beef on a weck, real wings..... If you get to Rochester or Syracuse, check out Dinosaur BBQ. Snow blower!? You ain't a "real" Western New Yorker! If you were, you'd use a shovel like they used to do a hundred years ago. It's still a perfectly efficient and viable means of snow removal. Anybody who uses a snow blower is just plain lazy. :-) Damn straight. ;-) I still have and use my shovel from Palmyra/Newark days. Just the right size for the car trunk, snow slips right off, eay on the back. If I were to ever move again, I think I'd just go to various places and walk around carrying a snow shovel. As soon as someone asked me, "What the heck is THAT?" -- I'd stop! Reworking of old Navy story about a sailor with an oar... Just make sure the guy who asks is a local resident and not some tourist from somewhere in the Mojave Desert who's just visiting! Or one of those lazy types who's just interested in clearing the driveway and has never even owned a shovel like a "real" Western New Yorker. Ayup. Or who thinks "lake effect" has something to do with a California basketball team... 73 de Jim, N2EY |
N2EY wrote: Radio Amateur KC2HMZ wrote in message . .. On 22 Jul 2003 05:47:23 GMT, ospam (Larry Roll K3LT) Breakfast or lunch, it matters not to me! A Beef on Weck and a glass of Genny would be a great way to enjoy some ham camaraderie. I might opt for a soft drink instead of the Genny, but other than that it sounds good to me. Be sure and let me know ahead of time next time you plan to head up this way, and we'll plan a get-together. (For those not familiar with Western new York culture, Genny is a locally brewed beer that's quite popular in these here parts) Rochester, to be exact. Gawd, I miss that stuff. Red hots, beef on a weck, real wings..... If you get to Rochester or Syracuse, check out Dinosaur BBQ. Something tells me that I'm stepping into a henway, but what is beef on a weck? - Mike KB3EIA - |
|
In article , Mike Coslo writes:
Rochester, to be exact. Gawd, I miss that stuff. Red hots, beef on a weck, real wings..... If you get to Rochester or Syracuse, check out Dinosaur BBQ. Something tells me that I'm stepping into a henway, but what is beef on a weck? A truly excellent sandwich. Roast beef on a kemmelweck roll (a type of round roll properly made only in the region, just as true hoagie rolls are only made by Amoroso). -- I may have told this one before, but years ago I was in North Tonawanda as part of a project for work. February, of course, and of course that particular job involved lots of time out-of-doors. Some vendors took us to lunch at the place where wings allegedly were invented. One of the vendors salesfolk made the mistake of saying "you can't make 'em too hot and spicy for me". The restaurant staff proved him wrong. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 08:08:52 -0400, Mike Coslo wrote:
Something tells me that I'm stepping into a henway, but what is beef on a weck? A sandwich consisting of sliced roast beef on a kimmel weck roll. Back in the days BC (before chicken wings), beef on weck was the delicacy of choice around here. 73 DE John, KC2HMZ |
In article , Mike Coslo writes:
Something tells me that I'm stepping into a henway, but what is beef on a weck? Mike: These days, probably about $4.95, plus drink, tax, and tip. More specifically, it's thin-sliced roast beef on a Küemmelweck roll. Very tasty with some extra-sharp horseradish and a nice big dill pickle on the side! 73 de Larry, K3LT |
ospam (Larry Roll K3LT) wrote in message ...
In article , (Brian Kelly) writes: Nephew Timothy trucks off to Rochester Tech for a degreee in fine arts photography Rochester being Kodak country and all that. A few months later he's grousing about spending more time digging out his dorm than he spends in class and the darkrooms. Family e-mail circuit lights up, tells him to hang tough, it can't be that bad, get a bigger shovel, you need the exercise, you're just a spoiled brat. Nothing further heard from him on the subject of snow. Xmas eve of his Sophomore year he completely announcededly blasts up the driveway (you've been up that driveway James, heh)in a U-Haul truck full of all his crap from his dorm room. "I quit, I quit, I quit, dammit they're all raving lunatics, their brains are frozen solid, they don't enough common sense to do anything BUT shovel the damned stuff! Brian: Pity. A degree in Photography from Rochester Tech could have meant that your nephew could have got something most "photographers" out there can only dream of: A job as a photographer that pays real money! I did the "I wanna be a photographer" bit myself for many years -- in fact, they were the 14 years when I was whining about code testing requirements in the ARS. I even had the requisite rubber stamp for the back of my prints that said, "Lawrence J. Roll, Photographer." I actually did a bit of paying work, shooting weddings and high school yearbook headshots for a studio. I won various prizes in photo contests in my own college and others in the WNY area. After joining the Air Force, I did 100% of the photos for my squadron yearbook during my tour in Korea, and later got to make some actual offical USAF photos when I was stationed at Andrews. One of my all time favorites is a shot of Pope John Paul II on his arrival at Andrews for his 1979 visit; he is holding the infant son of a young Sergeant on the base and his XYL who were there to greet His Holiness that day. This photo was sent to Rome and I received a letter of acknowledgement stating that it was placed on display on some wall somewhere in the Vatican. I also have some amazing photos of President and Mrs. Reagan on the Andrews flightline as they walked from the Marine One helicopter to Air Force One prior to departure on one of their many trips I "worked" as a Special Air Missions Coordinator. I've got to get those photos copyrighted; they could be worth a few bucks someday! I've been shutterbugging since about when radio got my attention. Let's take it offline, watch yer e-mail inbox maybe Sunday. 73 de Larry, K3LT \ w3rv |
|
Radio Amateur KC2HMZ wrote in message . ..
On 26 Jul 2003 02:22:12 GMT, (N2EY) wrote: I may have told this one before, but years ago I was in North Tonawanda as part of a project for work. February, of course, and of course that particular job involved lots of time out-of-doors. Some vendors took us to lunch at the place where wings allegedly were invented. North Tonawanda (or just NT to us locals) is my home town. I still spend more time in NT than in the Township of Tonawanda where I live now. Assuming they took you to the correct place, that would be the Anchor Bar on Main Street in Buffalo. That was the place, as I recall. One of the vendors salesfolk made the mistake of saying "you can't make 'em too hot and spicy for me". The restaurant staff proved him wrong. ...and I'd bet they cackled with glee while he was consuming mass quantities of whatever available liquid was nearby. Oyez! We all did. And again about 30 hours later.... They were GOOD, though. Not too hot for me! 73 de Jim, N2EY |
And there is nothing stopping you from enjoying the hobby of photography
either! I routinely spend time each week driving around for those perfect shots. There are other ways to earn money in photography as well. Try surviellance photography. Try crime/arson scene photography/documentation. Those are two different ways that I make a little extra income on the side that definitely helps! And they are definitely fun, and you see some amazing stuff! -- Ryan, KC8PMX FF1-FF2-MFR-(pending NREMT-B!) --. --- -.. ... .- -. --. . .-.. ... .- .-. . ..-. .. .-. . ..-. ... --. .... - . .-. ... Brian: Pity. A degree in Photography from Rochester Tech could have meant that your nephew could have got something most "photographers" out there can only dream of: A job as a photographer that pays real money! I did the "I wanna be a photographer" bit myself for many years -- in fact, they were the 14 years when I was whining about code testing requirements in the ARS. I even had the requisite rubber stamp for the back of my prints that said, "Lawrence J. Roll, Photographer." I actually did a bit of paying work, shooting weddings and high school yearbook headshots for a studio. I won various prizes in photo contests in my own college and others in the WNY area. After joining the Air Force, I did 100% of the photos for my squadron yearbook during my tour in Korea, and later got to make some actual offical USAF photos when I was stationed at Andrews. One of my all time favorites is a shot of Pope John Paul II on his arrival at Andrews for his 1979 visit; he is holding the infant son of a young Sergeant on the base and his XYL who were there to greet His Holiness that day. This photo was sent to Rome and I received a letter of acknowledgement stating that it was placed on display on some wall somewhere in the Vatican. I also have some amazing photos of President and Mrs. Reagan on the Andrews flightline as they walked from the Marine One helicopter to Air Force One prior to departure on one of their many trips I "worked" as a Special Air Missions Coordinator. I've got to get those photos copyrighted; they could be worth a few bucks someday! 73 de Larry, K3LT |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com