| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
July 21st 03, 11:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (N2EY) writes: In article , (Len Over 21) writes: In article , (N2EY) writes: But then why was the FCC so hot for more code testing in the 1960s? From the 1930s to the 1960s a ham could get full privs with a 13 wpm code test. Yes, the Extra and its 20 wpm code test was reintroduced in 1951, but then FCC gave all privs to Generals so nobody had to get an Extra for full privileges. And in fact very few did - in 1967, at the dawn of incentive licensing, there were maybe 4000 Extras out of about 250,000 US hams. At one point (1965), FCC proposed four code tests - 5, 13, 16, and 20 wpm. When the dust settled it took 20 per to get a full privileges. Why was FCC so hopped up on code testing back then? Intense lobbying by the ARRL? Nope. ARRL's proposal was to go back to the pre-1953 system where it took an Advanced or Extra for full privileges. Also reopen the Advanced to new licenses. Well whoopee for you. You asked a question, I answered it. Do you have a problem with the facts? You constantly repeat What Was Done. So? You constantly repeat What Len Did. If it doesn't favor your position, the FCC is the evil weenie. If it does favor your position then it is the Glory of the World... If someone doesn't agree with your position, they are an "evil weenie" and treated to your insult. If someone agrees with you they can do no wrong and are "the Glory of the World..." Heaven forbid someone prove you to be in error about anything. 1965 is THIRTY-EIGHT YEARS AGO, So what? You talk about much older things that are much less relevant. Radio for communications is "irrelevant?" Your personal experience of fifty plus years ago is irrelevant to amateur radio policy, but you repeat it anyway. THIRTY-EIGHT YEARS AGO you were about 10 years old. At the same time I'd already worked three years in military HF and micro- wave communications with my Honorable Discharge received five years in the past. Irrelevant to the discussion. No Internet then and Washington, DC, was a far place to get to and communicate by paper. Not at all. An envelope and a stamp. ...and the courage to write. "courage"? You spend a lot of your allowance on paper, envelopes and stamps, did you? Nope. Did you? Hams in the USA rarely wrote to the FCC for anything... Wrong. The incentive licensing proposals brought in over 6000 comments back then, even though there were only about 250,000 US hams. Oh? Yep. Did you frequent the FCC Reading Room in DC a lot? No - did you? Did you read all "6000" comments? No - did you? Frankly, I don't think you did squat about any comments way back when. I don't claim to. Did you comment "way back then"? Do you have any disproof of my facts as stated? Didn't think so. Tell us more about the ham-astronauts and their callsigns, Len. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1380 – January 23, 2004 | Dx | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | Dx | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1366  October 17 2003 | Dx | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1366  October 17 2003 | Dx | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1353 – July 18, 2003 | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
