| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
July 21st 03, 03:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind?
"Joe Collins" wrote in message
....what will happen to the exclusive CW allocations.... Except in the USA, most amateurs do not labor under "sub-bands" based on mode. As an example Canadian amateur have no such restrictions. It's a source of continuing wonder to me that the FCC continues to arbitrarily slice and dice the bands based on mode, license class, power levels, and similar artificial constructs of their imagination. 73, de Hans, K0HB PS: There are no "exclusive CW allocations" below 50MHz. -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| If you value SW or HAM radio.... | Antenna | |||
| FUD ALERT !!!!! (was With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind?) | General | |||
| With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | General | |||
| With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | Policy | |||
Threaded Mode
