Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 31st 03, 04:32 AM
Chic N Pox
 
Posts: n/a
Default NCVEC Position on Code


"Dick Carroll;" wrote in message
...
If/when the FCC totally eliminates code testing it will have made the
second biggest mistake of its tenure of regulating amateur radio. The first

was
the introduction of a Citizens Band on frequencies where
propagation causes RF to travel long distances.

Anyone who believes otherwise will, in time, learn the truth.

Dick


Hey Dick........

Were you perchance a Ham-Op in the 80's and early 90's
when the infamous "14.313 Booer Wars" between
KV4FZ's "anti-phone patch" factions and the opposing
Maritime Mobile Net's faction were in full swing..?

It was QUITE a time!

Just about any week night and all weekend long you could
tune to either 14.300 or 14.313 and hear any variety of
catcalls, music, snide comments, foul language, noisemakers,
the infamous "dirty black box" and anything else in-between.
(the way it worked was if the MM Net was on .313 then the
nuts were on .300 and visa-versa) This went on for close
to 12 Years that I was aware of. It became known as the
Ham Radio Comedy Channel and before it ended it drew in
just about every kook from 75 Meters.

Guess what Dick...? It turned out that 90% of the WORST
on the air offenders and un-ID'ed stations turned out to be
Hams with Advanced and Extra Class Licensees, most of
of which had held that ticket for 10 or more years duration
and more importantly, at that time one needed to pass a 13 and 20
WPM code test respectively to obtain in the first place!
(...unless of course, you bribed the VEC for your code-credit
which was occuring in parts of the Southeastern USA at the time)

So Dick, please remember that keeping Code WILL NOT
keep the fruitcakes out of the hobby, nor will it bring more stations
into the same. The fruitcakes are already here, and for the most
part, the general public does not know ham radio from a wris****ch
nor would they as the "radio craze" of the late-70's CB Era
ended a VERY long time ago.

Besides, if they (the public) want "radio communications" they are
going to go to WalMart and purchase a pair of blister-packed FRS
Radios for $39.95 from off the pegboard in Asile #7. (...and if you
went to WalMart back in April or May, you could have snagged
a pair of full-channel Motorola FRS Radios for $26.68 as I did
when they were on sale)

I've been in ham radio since the late 60's and
supported the ending of code
in the 80's when it would have done some good.
Forget it doing ANY good now of course as
today's youth are more interested in the Internet
than in ham radio. If they want "radio" there's FRS.
Buy em, put in 3 type AA Cells and your talkin with FRS.

Sorry but that's the truth.

Still, it's ****Un-be-freaking-lievable**** that the
same ages-old debate of if to keep stupid
damm old code or not is still going on.
Then again, ham radio has been in an arrested state
of development for Years.

Looks like ole Wayne Green was right ALL ALONG.

..... .. : ) : ) : )
  #2   Report Post  
Old July 31st 03, 05:23 AM
Floyd Davidson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Chic N Pox" wrote:
So Dick, please remember that keeping Code WILL NOT
keep the fruitcakes out of the hobby, nor will it bring more stations
into the same. The fruitcakes are already here, ...


The irony of trying to tell Dick that, is just too good.

He *is* proof; but all the other evidence you cited was
interesting... :-)

--
Floyd L. Davidson http://web.newsguy.com/floyd_davidson
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)
  #3   Report Post  
Old July 31st 03, 11:21 AM
N2EY
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Chic N Pox"
writes:

Were you perchance a Ham-Op in the 80's and early 90's
when the infamous "14.313 Booer Wars" between
KV4FZ's "anti-phone patch" factions and the opposing
Maritime Mobile Net's faction were in full swing..?

It was QUITE a time!

Just about any week night and all weekend long you could
tune to either 14.300 or 14.313 and hear any variety of
catcalls, music, snide comments, foul language, noisemakers,
the infamous "dirty black box" and anything else in-between.
(the way it worked was if the MM Net was on .313 then the
nuts were on .300 and visa-versa) This went on for close
to 12 Years that I was aware of. It became known as the
Ham Radio Comedy Channel and before it ended it drew in
just about every kook from 75 Meters.


Yup = a real black eye for amateur radio.

Guess what Dick...? It turned out that 90% of the WORST
on the air offenders and un-ID'ed stations turned out to be
Hams with Advanced and Extra Class Licensees, most of
of which had held that ticket for 10 or more years duration
and more importantly, at that time one needed to pass a 13 and 20
WPM code test respectively to obtain in the first place!
(...unless of course, you bribed the VEC for your code-credit
which was occuring in parts of the Southeastern USA at the time)

So Dick, please remember that keeping Code WILL NOT
keep the fruitcakes out of the hobby, nor will it bring more stations
into the same.


It won't keep 'em all out, that's for sure.

All of those violators also passed several written tests which included FCC
rules 'n' regs. Those written tests didn't stop 'em though. Shall we dump the
writtens 'cause they're not a perfect filter?

All that "variety of catcalls, music, snide comments, foul language,
noisemakers,
the infamous "dirty black box" and anything else in-between" - what mode were
those folks using? It sure wasn't CW/Morse.

Maybe it's not the code TEST but the code USE which is the filter.

73 de Jim, N2EY.
  #5   Report Post  
Old August 1st 03, 01:55 AM
Phil Kane
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 31 Jul 2003 17:37:02 -0700, Brian wrote:

I said it before the last restructuring and I guess its necessary that
I say it again, "What I fear most about restructuring the ARS is a
lack of enforcement, and what I fear most about maintaining the Status
Quo is a lack of enforcement. The Morse Exam is no substitute for
enforcement."


For once we agree.

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane

From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest
Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NCVEC Position on Code Chic N Pox General 1 July 31st 03 05:23 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM
NCVEC Position on Code Phil Kane Policy 0 July 31st 03 03:30 AM
NCVEC Position on Code Jim Hampton Policy 0 July 31st 03 12:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017