Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Phil Kane wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 21:58:16 GMT, D. Stussy wrote: What it all boils down to is that except for some very basic rules, regulations and safety considerations, most of the test requirements for an amateur license come down to somebody's opinion about what should be tested. Opinion and nothing more. And if the FCC didn't like that, then they'd take testing back and do it themselves. Thus substituting the judgment of the Chief,. Licensing and Rxamination Branch (the guy - yes, one individual - who used to make up the tests) for the judgment of the Question Pool Committee. That may be true. I never said it was a good idea. I only said that it's the government's option, good or bad. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NCVEC explains their licensing petition | Equipment | |||
NCVEC explains their licensing petition | Equipment | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||
My Comments On RM-10740, the "Wi-Fi" Petition | Policy |