Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 2nd 03, 06:20 AM
D. Stussy
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Phil Kane wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 21:58:16 GMT, D. Stussy wrote:
What it all boils down to is that except for some very basic rules,
regulations and safety considerations, most of the test requirements
for an amateur license come down to somebody's opinion about what
should be tested. Opinion and nothing more.


And if the FCC didn't like that, then they'd take testing back and do it
themselves.


Thus substituting the judgment of the Chief,. Licensing and
Rxamination Branch (the guy - yes, one individual - who used to make
up the tests) for the judgment of the Question Pool Committee.


That may be true. I never said it was a good idea. I only said that it's the
government's option, good or bad.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NCVEC explains their licensing petition Hamguy Equipment 0 March 24th 04 03:56 AM
NCVEC explains their licensing petition Hamguy Equipment 0 March 24th 04 03:56 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM
My Comments On RM-10740, the "Wi-Fi" Petition Steve Robeson, K4CAP Policy 1 July 6th 03 08:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017