Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rob Kemp wrote:
Quote from the American Public Power Association; "the burden should be imposed on challengers to BPL to demonstrate interference in a fact-based, empirical proof. Further, to the extent that interference is demonstrated, there should be an attempt to accommodate BPL, even if it means that existing communications providers may have to share or transfer bandwidth." http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs...t=6514287 496 BPL is not a system that needs to radiate RF signals to do its job, it would be an unintentional radiator. It's a system going point to point via wires, not a system that uses isolated boxes (radios) that communicate via RF "over the air". Thus there is no reason why we would need to share spectrum with BPL. Critical everyone submits a reply comment ASAP. To file, go here; http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi "Proceeding" field, enter "03-104" "Document Type" select "Reply to comments" |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Last Weekend To File FCC Comment | Dx | |||
Last Weekend To File FCC Comment | Dx |