Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 4th 03, 05:21 PM
Robert Casey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Rob Kemp wrote:

Quote from the American Public Power Association; "the burden should
be imposed on challengers to BPL to demonstrate interference in a
fact-based, empirical proof. Further, to the extent that interference
is demonstrated, there should be an attempt to accommodate BPL, even
if it means that existing communications providers may have to share
or transfer bandwidth."
http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs...t=6514287 496


BPL is not a system that needs to radiate RF signals to do its job, it
would be an
unintentional radiator. It's a system going point to point via wires,
not a system
that uses isolated boxes (radios) that communicate via RF "over the
air". Thus there
is no reason why we would need to share spectrum with BPL.

Critical everyone submits a reply comment ASAP.

To file, go here;
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi
"Proceeding" field, enter "03-104"
"Document Type" select "Reply to comments"




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Last Weekend To File FCC Comment L. M. Rappaport Dx 0 June 21st 04 03:28 PM
Last Weekend To File FCC Comment L. M. Rappaport Dx 0 June 21st 04 03:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017