Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Phil Kane" wrote in message
.net... On 02 Aug 2003 12:27:10 GMT, N2EY wrote: Then please explain why there are so many NALs for violations committed using voice modes, and so few for violations using Morse code or data modes. Maybe it's not the TEST but the MODE that has an effect? The days when the monitoring stations would catch ham operators 2 or 3 kHz outside the band edge (especially in contests) are gone forever. "Cruising" is no longer a daily activity. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon Heh heh, and maybe CW is not so commonly understood by those at the FCC? Phil? Kim W5TIT --- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net Complaints to |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NCVEC Position on Code | Policy | |||
NCVEC Position on Code | General | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||
NCVEC Position on Code | Policy | |||
NCVEC Position on Code | Policy |