| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#6
August 4th 03, 03:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"Carl R. Stevenson" wrote:
In article , (Brian) writes: And we've already heard from the Extra's how if they don't get their way they are going to destroy the amateur radio service. Dick, Larry, Dan, Bruce... Wait a minute ... don't tar all of us Extras with the same brush that Dick, Larry, et al deserve ... "Us Extras"? Whooo, that's rich, Carl! For example the vast majority of the Directors of NCI are Extras (or their national equivalent thereof). What differentiates a majority from a vast majority? In a country with only two license classes, the higher class license is equivalent to the U.S. Extra? Additionally, there are a significant number of Extras amongst our membership ... at least in proportion to the % of Extras to other license classes. What constitutes a "significant number" of Extas when compared to the percentage of your membership holding a license for which no code test is required? So, it's not "the Extras" ... it's the PCTAs ... ....and I gather that you don't have many members who support code testing :-) Dave K8MN |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| NCVEC Position on Code | Policy | |||
| NCVEC Position on Code | General | |||
| NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||
| NCVEC Position on Code | Policy | |||
| NCVEC Position on Code | Policy | |||
Threaded Mode
