LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old August 6th 03, 04:26 AM
Larry Roll K3LT
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Alun Palmer
writes:

It's not the truth, or even the TRVTH. RF is RF. I haven't noticed any
difference between amateur or professional RF energy.


Alun:

My point exactly. This is one of the reasons why the requirements to be
licensed in the AMATEUR radio service do not require professional-level
RF engineering skills. Nevertheless, Carl seems to hold on to the notion
that his being an RF engineer somehow grants him exalted status as an
AMATEUR radio operator. Why is that?

73 de Larry, K3LT

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NCVEC Position on Code Chic N Pox Policy 87 August 19th 03 12:41 PM
NCVEC Position on Code Chic N Pox General 1 July 31st 03 05:23 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM
NCVEC Position on Code Phil Kane Policy 0 July 31st 03 03:30 AM
NCVEC Position on Code Jim Hampton Policy 0 July 31st 03 12:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017