Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Alun Palmer
writes: Alun: My point exactly. This is one of the reasons why the requirements to be licensed in the AMATEUR radio service do not require professional-level RF engineering skills. Nevertheless, Carl seems to hold on to the notion that his being an RF engineer somehow grants him exalted status as an AMATEUR radio operator. Why is that? 73 de Larry, K3LT Could it be because he knows a lot about radio? Alun: Well, I'm sure Carl expects that his professional RF engineering qualifications should grant him exalted status in the ARS, but in truth, it just ain't so! I know lots of radio amateurs, of all license classes, who haven't made dime number one as a professional electronics technician or engineer, who are infinitely better hams than I am or Carl could ever be. What they all have in common is the fact that they have, throughout their "careers" as radio amateurs, been willing to explore and adopt new modes, while retaining the skills learned with the old ones, particularly Morse/CW. Their stations are truly up-to-date, they have usually attained high places on the DXCC standings, routinely hold leadership positions within their clubs, and can be counted on to provide valuable input and personal support for all club activities. They are the ones who newcomers look to for the answers, while the so-called "professional" hams simply cluster amongst themselves and look down their noses at the proceedings of the rest of the club. But yes, indeed, Carl does know a lot about radio! 73 de Larry, K3LT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NCVEC Position on Code | Policy | |||
NCVEC Position on Code | General | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||
NCVEC Position on Code | Policy | |||
NCVEC Position on Code | Policy |