Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Floyd Davidson
writes: Mike Coslo wrote: Dick Carroll; wrote: Floyd Davidson wrote: some snippage You increase the SNR, regardless of the bandwidth, by increasing the signal level DICK. Well, so much for your technical knowledge if THAT"S all you know about it. Any experienced ham, even without ANY tech schooling whatever, knows better than that. As a dilletante, I realize that in any ratio, there are two numbers. Actually, there are three (bandwidth, signal, and noise) which are related to channel capacity by the following formula Capacity = Bandwidth * Log2 ( 1 + Signal/Noise ) The debate is over comparing *efficiency* of different modes (CW and PSK-31), and hence the channel capacity for such a comparison, must be normalized. Reducing the Bandwidth parameter does decrease the observed SNR in the channel, but the Capacity is not increased because the actual noise power per Hz is unchanged. Ahem. Four. Include error rate. :-) Claude Shannon used teleprinters as a working example in his 1947 landmark paper. That made it more familiar to communications people in the REST of the communications world. Not many radio amateurs knew how teleprinters worked or how they were coded in 1947. :-) "Shannon's Laws" apply to EVERY communications medium, wired or wireless. According to a few ignorant extras the "don't apply" to amateur radio. :-) So while it is quite possible to make the s/n ratio larger by increasing the signal, it is equally possible, and sometimes much better to increase the s/n ratio by lowering the noise. Sometimes it is the *only* option available. However, what has to change is the noise power per Hz, and reducing the bandwidth does not change that. Heh, it's hard enough to get amateurs to use the proper multiplier prefix on frequencies, let alone grasp a concept of noise power per unit bandwidth. :-) Seems like narrowing the bandwidth might just do that! Increasing the signal power has the desired effect. There are other ways to accomplish that, of course. Reduction of noise by any means other than reducing the bandwidth (switching from an omni directional antenna to a directional antenna, for example) will have the desired effect. your humble hockey puck, 8^) Hows come, then, you don't have a Canadian call sign? He might have drunk all his Canadian Club. :-) LHA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NCVEC Position on Code | Policy | |||
NCVEC Position on Code | General | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||
NCVEC Position on Code | Policy | |||
NCVEC Position on Code | Policy |