Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Phil Kane"
writes: On 02 Aug 2003 12:27:10 GMT, N2EY wrote: Then please explain why there are so many NALs for violations committed using voice modes, and so few for violations using Morse code or data modes. Maybe it's not the TEST but the MODE that has an effect? The days when the monitoring stations would catch ham operators 2 or 3 kHz outside the band edge (especially in contests) are gone forever. "Cruising" is no longer a daily activity. Not the point. How big of a problem do we have with hams using CW straying outdie the band edges at any time? Compare that to problems with hams using voice modes and jamming, cussing, failing to ID, etc. Yes, the op is ultimately responsible, that's a given. But the fact remains that there are orders of magnitude difference in violations... 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NCVEC Position on Code | Policy | |||
NCVEC Position on Code | General | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||
NCVEC Position on Code | Policy | |||
NCVEC Position on Code | Policy |