LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old September 1st 03, 04:19 PM
N2EY
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Phil Kane"
writes:

On 02 Aug 2003 12:27:10 GMT, N2EY wrote:

Then please explain why there are so many NALs for violations
committed using voice modes, and so few for violations using Morse
code or data modes. Maybe it's not the TEST but the MODE that has an
effect?


The days when the monitoring stations would catch ham operators 2
or 3 kHz outside the band edge (especially in contests) are gone
forever. "Cruising" is no longer a daily activity.

Not the point. How big of a problem do we have with hams using CW straying
outdie the band edges at any time? Compare that to problems with hams using
voice modes and jamming, cussing, failing to ID, etc.

Yes, the op is ultimately responsible, that's a given. But the fact remains
that there are orders of magnitude difference in violations...

73 de Jim, N2EY



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NCVEC Position on Code Chic N Pox Policy 87 August 19th 03 12:41 PM
NCVEC Position on Code Chic N Pox General 1 July 31st 03 05:23 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM
NCVEC Position on Code Phil Kane Policy 0 July 31st 03 03:30 AM
NCVEC Position on Code Jim Hampton Policy 0 July 31st 03 12:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017