Radio Amateur KC2HMZ wrote:
In the case of morphoholic, the issue isn't what his license class is,
but whether or not he even HAS one. He claimed to. Anyone can claim to
have a license.

Please show me one post where I claimed anything of the sort. Stop
making **** up to fit your agenda, or STFU.

--
GO# 40

Those of us who did not spend summers at the shore had even more
opportunities. Of course there was the 30 day retest wait....


Did anyone ever get caught showing up say a week early for retest?
Today you'd
have computers that could spot it, but back in the old days did they
bother to check?

On 14 Aug 2003 16:29:31 GMT, wrote:

Radio Amateur KC2HMZ wrote:
In the case of morphoholic, the issue isn't what his license class is,
but whether or not he even HAS one. He claimed to. Anyone can claim to
have a license.

Please show me one post where I claimed anything of the sort. Stop
making **** up to fit your agenda, or STFU.

Okay, fine, that's better yet - if you're now saying you do not have a
license, that makes you a worthless CB troll, which is what I
suspected all along.

Funny how every time guys like you open their mouths, it's to change
which foot is in there.

You might as well go back to rec.radio.cb now - where you belong.

(sarcasm mode on)

But gee, dontcha know the arrl is blameless? Of course they only take
credit for good news/stuff.

(sarcasm mode off)



--
Ryan, KC8PMX
FF1-FF2-MFR-(pending NREMT-B!)
--. --- -.. ... .- -. --. . .-.. ... .- .-. . ..-. .. .-. . ..-.
... --. .... - . .-. ...
All real hams out there who remember how the bands used to be, send the
ARRL a nasty-gram and cancel your League memberships. They screwed us
over big time by not protecting the integrity of the Amateur radio
Service.



No Code.... No Ham!

W hy in hell would they want it back??????????

"OOTMAN" wrote in message
...
W hy in hell would they want it back??????????


Better utilization of HF spectrum, and more spectrum for hams. All the
non-ham stuff should be VHF or UHF, for the obvious reason.

Charles Brabham, N5PVL

charlesb wrote:

"OOTMAN" wrote in message
...


W hy in hell would they want it back??????????




Better utilization of HF spectrum, and more spectrum for hams. All the
non-ham stuff should be VHF or UHF, for the obvious reason.

Charles Brabham, N5PVL




But 10 meters is rarely crowded, getting 11 back, though nice, isn't
that critical.
More bandwidth on 20 or 40 I would prefer.

charlesb wrote:

"OOTMAN" wrote in message
...

W hy in hell would they want it back??????????



Better utilization of HF spectrum, and more spectrum for hams. All the
non-ham stuff should be VHF or UHF, for the obvious reason.

Charles Brabham, N5PVL


The hams hardly used 11 meters when they had it, what makes you think
they would use it now if they got it back? Besides, the cbers have made
such a mess of it, it would take years to clean the filth out.

JJ wrote:
charlesb wrote:

"OOTMAN" wrote in message
...

W hy in hell would they want it back??????????



Better utilization of HF spectrum, and more spectrum for hams. All the
non-ham stuff should be VHF or UHF, for the obvious reason.

Charles Brabham, N5PVL


The hams hardly used 11 meters when they had it, what makes you think
they would use it now if they got it back? Besides, the cbers have made
such a mess of it, it would take years to clean the filth out.


equating cb'ers and filth eh? in your limited world hams dont freeband?
guess you havn't heard the cw contests on 11 meters. so much for your
post...