Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Robert Casey" wrote in message
... This is actually not such a bad idea. I've always supported dropping the 155.3 mi. limit on CB and the idea of allowing hams to reduce their power and elmer CBers on channels 36 through 40 USB on the finer point of DXing. I think it'd be a great recruitment tool, just MHO. We could do that now, *IF* we use type accepted (or whatever they call it nowadays) CB radios instead of our ham transcievers, and not exceed the distance limit. 'Zactly! I currently run a slightly older Uniden Grant XL, type certified and 100% legal. But I think the CBers might see us as invaders on their turf, like we see them when invading 10m. It might be better to be low key, I usually keep it subtle and have always had pretty good results. NOTE: Those who bootleg on 10m (Or any other ham band.) are neither included in this discussion nor welcomed on either band. I'll drop a dime on them in a NY minute! (...and have done so in the past.) maybe have the ARRL buy ads in CB magizines that say IMHO, the ARRL blew a golden opportunity for a win-win situation in 2000 when it comment against RM-9807. I don't think the ARRL's is very much appreciated among CB circles, HOWEVER, true CB "hobbyists" (Sorry, Phil.) DO respect ARO's and are usually quite receptive. something like "if you get a general or extra ham license, you can DX on many different bands using more power (legally) even when the sunspots are out of season. 'You already love radio, see how much more fun you can have with a ham license'." Of course one would have to wordsmith it right to attract serious and disiplined operators and not the kids and "lids". Without making ham radio look condensending or putting CBers down. Funny story...well, kinda. I walked into the corner 7-Eleven and prepared to get my dailly fix of Java when a chap nodded in my direction and asked "you a ham?" It occured to me that he had seen my AR license plates and since we were the only two in the store, it was equally easy for me to notice the Wilson 1000 atop his vehicle. I nodded toward his car and asked him "what'cha runnin'?" Well, I could tell right away it wasn't kosher because you could cut the immediate cloud of nerousness with a knife. "Relax, I've been where you are and I can help you get to where you wanna be." Crash, down came the wall of apprehension. He was using one of those zillion channel Ranger rigs. I explained that if he'd let me, I could show him how to use that legally. Subtly massaged the enforcement angle into the conversation too. I lived three blocks away so I permanently lent him my Gordo Tech study guide and a copy of my ARRL code CD's. Told him the code test was nothing to sweat and if he any problems just give me a holler. Well, the next time he "hollered," he had two CSCE's in hand and a new Tech"+" was waiting for a call. Now that he's tasted more bandwidth, he doesn't want to risk losing those priviledges on any illegal 11-meter frequencies anymore. I personally don't care what his motivations are to fly straight are, I'm just glad that he is. Sure, I could've immediately beaten him up re. his rig or lectured him on what CB was originally intended for...but what would it have gained? CB gained a legal op, and he gained a whole new world of radio. For all I know, he might very well be an Extra by now. I do know it felt good. :-) I'm not that good a writer, but I think that it could be done well. I think you just did a great job. -- 73 de Bert WA2SI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #665 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | General | |||
Do Hams get 11 Meters Back | General |