Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Radio Amateur KC2HMZ" wrote in message ... On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 20:01:22 GMT, "Bert Craig" wrote: I have an understanding of what CB WAS supposed to be for as well as what it HAS evolved into. (...and I don't mean the out-of-band lids with the illegal amplifiers either.) Well, then you must mean the IN-the-band lids with the illegal amplifiers. Not to mention echo mikes, electronic noisemakers, and...well, just listen down there and compile your own list. I personally have no want to bang my fist down on the table and proclaim that "that's not what it was originally meant for." That's what it's become, plain and simple. Don't like it? Then get your fmr. comrades to kick it up a notch or two wrt enforcement and stop it... I wholeheartedly second the motion! or admit their boo-boo (CB on HF and they can't respond to a natuarally occuring phenomenon, hihi.) I think they already have, and I think that's part of the reason why MURS was created, thus putting no-license radio on VHF where it ought to have been put in the first place. and try to take a little advantage of the situation. On the other hand, there's no enforcement on the MURS frequencies either. Around here (Buffalo, NY area) they already sound like the 11m band, complete with illegal power levels and toilet-mouthed jerks, many of whom can also be heard on 11m. Then there's the marine VHF band... 73 DE John, KC2HMZ Just like I figured would happen. And just what some of the no-codes are trying to make ham radio like. Dan/W4NTI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #665 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | General | |||
Do Hams get 11 Meters Back | General |