Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ray Neville" wrote:
"Bob" wrote: "Phil Kane" wrote: Brian Kelly wrote: "N22X" wrote: unheard of! Plain truth is the FCC is out of the monitoring & enforcement business! Permanently! Since the FCC closed all their monitoring stations seven years ago, The FCC did *not* close all their monitoring stations. In fact when the monitoring stations were remoted, an additional one was added. The station at Canandaigua, NY was brought back on line after being closed for a number of years (it was used as the test bed for developing the remote control system). The FCC closed down all monitoring stations in 1996, and turned over the land they sat on to GAO for disposal. The FCC no longer has any monitoring or locational capability. Today's FCC is only a paper pushing bureaucracy, without any technical expertise. Sorry if you can't deal with the facts, but that is your problem and doesn't change the truth. Ray, can you explain to me why 47 CFR Part 0 Section 121 lists 14 locations for "protected" FCC field offices, including the Canadaigua location mentioned above and the Laurel, Maryland station mentioned in another post? The locations are protected from RF emissions by licensed radio services *because* they are FCC monitoring stations. Section 121 was updated in 1998, 1999, and 2002, so how can it be that these locations are still listed and still protected if the monitoring functions there were discontinued and the physical facilities disposed of in 1996? Here is the list, coordinates included: Allegan, Michigan 42[deg]36[min]20.1[sec] N. Latitude 85[deg]57[min]20.1[sec] W. Longitude Anchorage, Alaska 61[deg]09[min]41.[sec] N. Latitude 150[deg]00[min]03.0[sec] W. Longitude Belfast, Maine 44[deg]26[min]42.3[sec] N. Latitude 69[deg]04[min]56.1[sec] W. Longitude Canandaigua, New York 42[deg]54[min]48.2[sec] N. Latitude 77[deg]15[min]57.9[sec] W. Longitude Douglas, Arizona 31[deg]30[min]02.3[sec] N. Latitude 109[deg]39[min]14.3[sec] W. Longitude Ferndale, Washington 48[deg]57[min]20.4[sec] N. Latitude 122[deg]33[min]17.6[sec] W. Longitude Grand Island, Nebraska 40[deg]55[min]21.0[sec] N. Latitude 98[deg]25[min]43.2[sec] W. Longitude Kingsville, Texas 27[deg]26[min]30.1[sec] N. Latitude 97[deg]53[min]01.0[sec] W. Longitude Laurel, Maryland 39[deg]09[min]54.4[sec] N. Latitude 76[deg]49[min]15.9[sec] W. Longitude Livermore, California 37[deg]43[min]29.7[sec] N. Latitude 121[deg]45[min]15.8[sec] W. Longitude Powder Springs, Georgia 33[deg]51[min]44.4[sec] N. Latitude 84[deg]43[min]25.8[sec] W. Longitude Santa Isabel, Puerto Rico 18[deg]00[min]18.9[sec] N. Latitude 66[deg]22[min]30.6[sec] W. Longitude Vero Beach, Florida 27[deg]36[min]22.1[sec] N. Latitude 80[deg]38[min]05.2[sec] W. Longitude Waipahu, Hawaii 21[deg]22[min]33.6[sec] N. Latitude 157[deg]59[min]44.1[sec] W. Longitude Additionally, from http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Inspector_General/Reports/sar997.txt we have the following assessment (as of late 1997): The reorganization entailed the closure of nine attended frequency monitoring stations and three additional monitoring sites located at FCC field offices. In place of these previously manned stations, a national automated monitoring network is now controlled from an existing facility in Columbia, Maryland. Nine of the 25 existing field offices as well as three of the six regional offices were closed. Two technical staff members continue to be assigned as Resident Agents in the nine locations in which field offices were closed. So lets see, of 25 field offices 9 were close, leaving 14. And an automated monitoring network is in use, for which there are 14 protected locations. Does this add up to anything like "out of the monitoring & enforcement business! Permanently!" or "the FCC closed all their monitoring stations seven years ago" or "The FCC closed down all monitoring stations in 1996" or "and turned over the land they sat on to GAO for disposal" or "The FCC no longer has any monitoring or locational capability" or is there by any chance a large amount of disinformation being relayed here as if it were fact? -- Floyd L. Davidson http://web.newsguy.com/floyd_davidson Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |