LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3   Report Post  
Old August 18th 03, 12:08 AM
Carl R. Stevenson
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dan Finn" wrote in message
...

Well-written petition. I personally oppose it, but it is well-written with
what might be considered a logical rationale giving all of the
justifications for the NCI position. It deserves a chance to be

considered,
in my opinion, and I hope that the FCC does issue a call for comments.



Thanks for the kind words, Dan ... and for the spirit of faireness your
comments above show.

They
probably will not, believing that the recent reduction to very-slow-code

(5
wpm) was a good compromise, i.e. not acceptable to either side.


I have ZERO doubt that the FCC will consider this matter.
It's merely a question of how soon and how quickly they move.

Carl - wk3c

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NCVEC explains their licensing petition Hamguy Equipment 0 March 24th 04 03:56 AM
NCVEC explains their licensing petition Hamguy Equipment 0 March 24th 04 03:56 AM
FYI: QRZ Forum - NCVEC Petition & Comments Old Dxer Policy 0 August 5th 03 02:22 PM
Some comments on the NCVEC petition D. Stussy Policy 13 August 5th 03 04:23 AM
Sign in the petition against the abuse of the Band Plan forward this message to your buddies) Brengsek! Dx 3 August 2nd 03 01:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017