| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
November 5th 03, 01:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"S. Hanrahan" wrote in message
... On 6 Sep 2003 07:23:43 -0700, (Brian) wrote: Oh, geez. Here's another Morse Elitist that apparently advocates sending code so **** poorly that it can't be computer copied. Hoo-ah! At 5 WPM, you don't need a computer to copy good or poor code. I think you've just hit the nail on the head. It's really not how hard or easy 5-wpm is, it's the willingness (or lack thereof) to make the initial (i.e. "initiative") effort to learn the 43 required characters. I came into the fray relatively unbiased re. the code vs. no-code debate. However, once you hear some of the arguments presented, it's hard not to see it for what it really is. 73 de Bert WA2SI |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| NCI filed Petition for Rulemaking Aug. 13 | Policy | |||
| FYI: QRZ Forum - NCVEC Petition & Comments | Policy | |||
| Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
| Sign in the petition against the abuse of the Band Plan forward this message to your buddies) | Dx | |||
| My Comments On RM-10740, the "Wi-Fi" Petition | Policy | |||
Threaded Mode
