LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old August 23rd 03, 02:53 AM
Brian
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(N2EY) wrote in message . com...
"Carl R. Stevenson" wrote in message ...
"WA3IYC" wrote in message
...
Would you agree with this statement:

however, at the same time, those who are not interested in building radios
should not be forced to learn how they work in order to gain amateur radio
privileges ...


No ... because, even if you don't build your own radios, you are responsible
for their proper operation.


Do you think every ham understands how their radios work? Do you think
the tests even begin to measure the things a ham needs to know to
determine if a radio is working properly?


Do you think that you could submit questions to the QPC concerning
those things that a ham needs to know?

And so it degenerates into a Morse Code argument again. Knowledge and
skill in Morse (Farnsworth) will keep your radio working properly.

2) Knowledge of morse code can only be measured by a practical skill
test.

Excuse me ... I think you mean "proficiency in " not "knowledge of" ...

No, I mean "knowledge of". Skills are a form of knowledge, as are facts

and
concepts. Perhaps it would be better to write "practical knowledge"


No, it's proficiency that the test measures


That's a skill.

... proficiency in decoding Morse
in one's head at some specified speed.


5 wpm. Which is not "proficient" by any stretch of the imagination.


Its the new standard, albeit probably short lived.

And that's ALL it is according to
the FCC (see the "No Code Technician" decision from 1990 and the R&O
in 98-143 ... you'll see EXACTLY that in both documents).


Sure. But just because FCC says it does not make it true.


Ditto the ARRL.

The Morse test which is Element 1 tests the skill of receiving Morse code
at a very basic level.


Exactly, it measures a specific level of proficiency.


"Proficiency" starts at 10 wpm.


Where is Morse proficiency defined? Where is Morse defined?
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NCI filed Petition for Rulemaking Aug. 13 Carl R. Stevenson Policy 74 August 25th 03 02:18 AM
FYI: QRZ Forum - NCVEC Petition & Comments Old Dxer Policy 0 August 5th 03 03:22 PM
Some comments on the NCVEC petition D. Stussy Policy 13 August 5th 03 05:23 AM
Sign in the petition against the abuse of the Band Plan forward this message to your buddies) Brengsek! Dx 3 August 2nd 03 02:53 PM
My Comments On RM-10740, the "Wi-Fi" Petition Steve Robeson, K4CAP Policy 1 July 6th 03 09:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017