"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message igy.com...
"Brian" wrote in message
om...
S. Hanrahan wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 10:00:13 -0400, Bob Brock
wrote:


Why would you want to foil computer copy?

Because no law says you can't.

For you to do the test to
make sure that it works and then advocate it's use, you can't really
say that wasn't your intention.

What if it was? Nothing you can do about it but learn the code.

Oh, geez. Here's another Morse Elitist that apparently advocates
sending code so **** poorly that it can't be computer copied. Hoo-ah!

Don't need to send it poorly.

Does anyone have a need to send it poorly (except DICK)?

More importantly, you shouldn't try to send it poorly. You should
send it to the very best of your ability.

But if you send it very poorly with the intention of thwarting machine
copy, what do you think the result will be?

Only strong code signals under good
propagation conditions can be adequatly copied by the computer anyway. I'm
only mediocre at the code myself but I routinely copy better than the
computer anytime conditions are less than ideal such as with weak signals,
poor propagation, high static, or high interference.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

Brian