Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Stinson" wrote in message ... Money talks, public service walks- BPL is a certainty. Money's the half of it. Ego and politics are the other half. Pols like Michael Powell and Billy Tauzin want credit for sweeping away all those presumably outmoded concerns about RFI so people in rural areas can get the on ramp to the modern hi-speed info superhighway right there in their fusebox. The "null it out- anyone can do it" argument is crap- works well in theory, poorly in the field. Even with excellent nulling, QRP and other weak signal work is finished. Shortwave DXing is finished. You have three choices- Give up radio. Move far enough into the country to avoid the polluted grid, "Gorilla warfare-" Power lines that leak out, can also leak IN. 50 watts of broadband noise generator plugged into the nearest socket would do. Note that I would never advocate anything illegal..... D.S. As a former US President said, "We could do it, but it would be wrong." I have to wonder how much BPL access would be knocked out by a sparky old ozone generating vacuum cleaner. One room? A few houses? And let's not forget our old nemisis, the bargain basement switchmode computer power supply. I have one which pumps enough hashy variable frequency hets to overwhelm even strong local broadcast stations on a radio in the same room. Some thief ran, well -- hobbled, off with my arc welder a few years ago. I never replaced it. Good thing, I now realize. I kinda doubt electrical interference would cut off somebody's BPL access entirely. I picture the error rate going up and up, and the connection speeds going down and down. Maybe even slower than dial-up. Even worse, the guy who pays for BPL is likely to blame the power company, rather than the real culprit -- the clown who just doesn't give a damn about RFI. Frank Dresser |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 16:43:12 GMT, Frank Dresser wrote:
Even worse, the guy who pays for BPL is likely to blame the power company, rather than the real culprit -- the clown who just doesn't give a damn about RFI. Aren't they the same in that situation ?? -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Phil Kane" wrote in message et... On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 16:43:12 GMT, Frank Dresser wrote: Even worse, the guy who pays for BPL is likely to blame the power company, rather than the real culprit -- the clown who just doesn't give a damn about RFI. Aren't they the same in that situation ?? -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane Partly. The power company doesn't care. The FCC seems lax in Part 15 enforcement, among other things. Certain congressmen seem to think the only impediments to the Jetson way of life are outmoded regulations. The neighbors only think of interference when Tom Brokaw turns green and they blame it on the SWL's random wire antenna. The only people who give a damn about RFI are the people who use radio. I'm not an expert on BPL, but I don't have any faith in the FCC's ability to look past a glossy demo and into the real world, either. If I had been invited to the demos, I'd have brought my old vacuum cleaner and my homebuilt PC with the noisy power supply(which, I assume, is good under Part 15 regs. Ha!). I think somebody would give a damn if everyday electrical noisemakers slowed BPL. Frank Dresser |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm not an expert on BPL, but I don't have any faith in the FCC's ability to look past a glossy demo and into the real world, either. If I had been invited to the demos, I'd have brought my old vacuum cleaner and my homebuilt PC with the noisy power supply(which, I assume, is good under Part 15 regs. Ha!). I think somebody would give a damn if everyday electrical noisemakers slowed BPL. Don't know about BPL, but back when they were testing various proposed broadcast HDTV transmission standards, one of the devices used in noise tests was literally an old vacuum cleaner motor. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David,
Looks like I'm going to have to research some nice linear as well as a decent HF station. I had been looking at a vertical to avoid all of the horizontal lines in the neighborhood, but, on second thought ... 1500 watts horizontally polarized, 50 feet from the power lines might prove interesting ![]() 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA ps - we need a study as to where the biggest ingress will occur ![]() "David Stinson" wrote in message ... Money talks, public service walks- BPL is a certainty. The "null it out- anyone can do it" argument is crap- works well in theory, poorly in the field. Even with excellent nulling, QRP and other weak signal work is finished. Shortwave DXing is finished. You have three choices- Give up radio. Move far enough into the country to avoid the polluted grid, "Gorilla warfare-" Power lines that leak out, can also leak IN. 50 watts of broadband noise generator plugged into the nearest socket would do. Note that I would never advocate anything illegal..... D.S. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 8/19/03 |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... David, Looks like I'm going to have to research some nice linear as well as a decent HF station. I had been looking at a vertical to avoid all of the horizontal lines in the neighborhood, but, on second thought ... 1500 watts horizontally polarized, 50 feet from the power lines might prove interesting ![]() 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA ps - we need a study as to where the biggest ingress will occur ![]() Hmmm. I can't imagine any way Ham radio interference would do any good, even if legal. Interference might not have effect it at all. Or it might cause a slowdown the BPL user would attribute to internet congestion. If the BPL user believes interference is casuing a problem with his gee-whiz powerline internet access, he's gonna squak to the power company and maybe the FCC. Face it, radio hobbyists are in no position for poor public relations. There are more people who will be attracted to the bright, shiny promise of BPL than there are radio hobbyists. Considering the numbers, would it be unlikely for the FCC to redefine the interference limits? I'd be curious to know how vunerable BPL is to interference. I have no doubt the BPL people have run tests, and I'm a little surprised they're not at the front of a webpage somewhere. Ham radio may not have alot of effect. The power lines will only absorb a fraction of what's transmitted, and will probably re-radiate most of that. I would think interference from devices plugged directly into the lines would have the most effect. Like spikey old universal motors and cheap switchmode power supplies. Politically, it's far better if damaging interference comes from everyday objects around the home. Like the vacuum cleaner, the microwave oven, the kid's computer, etc. And nothing will help as much as bringing new people into the radio hobby. Frank Dresser |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim:
Even BEFORE they start this BPL thing, the existing power lines emanate a ton of interference anyways. It is almost impossible for me to listen to anything HF around here because the lines around here are terrible. I can only imagine how much worse it will get with adding the BPL stuff as well. I am definitely a proponent of having the utilities switching (albeit expensive) to buried electrical lines. Only exception might be where the lines need to cross a river etc. -- Ryan, KC8PMX FF1-FF2-MFR-(pending NREMT-B!) --. --- -.. ... .- -. --. . .-.. ... .- .-. . ..-. .. .-. . ..-. ... --. .... - . .-. ... "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... David, Looks like I'm going to have to research some nice linear as well as a decent HF station. I had been looking at a vertical to avoid all of the horizontal lines in the neighborhood, but, on second thought ... 1500 watts horizontally polarized, 50 feet from the power lines might prove interesting ![]() 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA ps - we need a study as to where the biggest ingress will occur ![]() "David Stinson" wrote in message ... Money talks, public service walks- BPL is a certainty. The "null it out- anyone can do it" argument is crap- works well in theory, poorly in the field. Even with excellent nulling, QRP and other weak signal work is finished. Shortwave DXing is finished. You have three choices- Give up radio. Move far enough into the country to avoid the polluted grid, "Gorilla warfare-" Power lines that leak out, can also leak IN. 50 watts of broadband noise generator plugged into the nearest socket would do. Note that I would never advocate anything illegal..... D.S. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 8/19/03 |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Amazing, a scenario where an SWL would move into the city because of
less QRN. On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 15:41:04 GMT, David Stinson wrote: Money talks, public service walks- BPL is a certainty. The "null it out- anyone can do it" argument is crap- works well in theory, poorly in the field. Even with excellent nulling, QRP and other weak signal work is finished. Shortwave DXing is finished. You have three choices- Give up radio. Move far enough into the country to avoid the polluted grid, "Gorilla warfare-" Power lines that leak out, can also leak IN. 50 watts of broadband noise generator plugged into the nearest socket would do. Note that I would never advocate anything illegal..... D.S. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Roll K3LT wrote:
... Do you have any idea how many lawyers the big electric utilities can afford to get on your case? They won't get much, Larry. Nothing left of my arse but scar tissue.... 73 Dave |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Stinson wrote: Larry Roll K3LT wrote: ... Do you have any idea how many lawyers the big electric utilities can afford to get on your case? They won't get much, Larry. Nothing left of my arse but scar tissue.... 73 Dave waaaaaay too much information!!! - Mike KB3EIA - |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
new kenwood ts480 voip internet ready | Dx | |||
new kenwood ts480 voip internet ready | Dx | |||
new kenwood ts480 voip internet ready | General |