| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Carl R. Stevenson" wrote in message ...
.. . . . However, Dick and other Morse fanatics insist that those modes aren't a suitable option because they (dread the thought) require a computer Modes which require a computer to run 'em cut both ways. Having to use a computer to run the stuff represents a huge increase in station complexity and the inevitable corresponding decrease in station reliability. Additionally cost, weight, space, power consumption, required technical skills and a bunch of other factors also mitigate against the use of computer-based modes. Given the mythical average ham who could care less about weak-signal performances and/or throughput rates. Very few of which show up around here, least of all in this discussion. So in this sense Dick is right. (and some hardware/software that I'm sure "Shannon doesn't mean squat Dick" couldn't even begin to understand). Carl - wk3c w3rv |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|