"Bob Brock" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003 19:46:51 -0500, "Kim W5TIT"
wrote:


OK Kim, show me where I said that I would boycott someone because of
their code status and I'll get back with you. If you can't quote me
saying that, who made the jump in logic will be apparent.

The ball is in your court.


Hold up there, Bob Brock. SHOW ME where anyone has said you would
"boycott
someone because of their code status." No one has said a word about you
doing that. YOU copped the attitude with the return of Jim's answer to
you
and my remarks. No where in the above material has Jim or I said a word
about you boycotting anything. HOWEVER, in your earnest desire to be the
victim, you missed that all Jim or I have done is answer your question,
with
nothing but sideline remarks back and forth to each other on the topic.

I don't know what ball you've served to my court--I am not playing on a
court, I am submitting remarks to a discussion.

Kim W5TIT


From elsewhere in the thread...

[I said]

Show me where I said that anyone proposed it and I'll consider
documenting it. I'm not in the habit of trying to document things
that I never said and I won't start with you.

[Dick Carroll said]

Yep. Another one of "them". He proposed it but he didn't propose it.

--------------------------------------
I admit that you may not agree with the above accusation. If so, say
so now and I'll apologize.


Nope, I don't. But for goodness sake, don't apologize. Good grief. You've
nothing to be apologetic about--'least not the way I see it.

And, for goodness sake again--don't *even* be affected by anything Dick
Carroll, Waddles (WA8ULX or whatever), Larry Roll or even Dave Heil says.
They're humorous, at best. They all remind me of drunken old rambling men.

Kim W5TIT