Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 6th 03, 06:55 PM
Dee D. Flint
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"N2EY" wrote in message
...
In article , Bob Brock
writes:

Call it a matter of personal ethics. Upgrading would have been the
easy way out.


Or consider this:

Which do you think is more convincing to FCC as a reason to remove Element

1:

- The person who says "I won't upgrade until that test is removed"

or

- The person who says "I took the test, passed it, yet I think there is no
reason for that test to exist any more."

73 de Jim, N2EY


I'd certainly give a lot more credence to the guy that's done it rather than
the one who hasn't.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1360– September 5 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 6th 03 10:08 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1360– September 5 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 6th 03 10:08 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1360– September 5 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 6th 03 10:08 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1360– September 5 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 6th 03 10:08 AM
Some comments on the NCVEC petition D. Stussy Policy 13 August 5th 03 05:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017