Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
. .. JJ wrote: Dick Carroll wrote in message ... Don't pay them too much attention, Bruce. Neither JJ nor TwIT realizes they were NOT using a 1/4 wave dipole. If they had been, neither would have gotten a signal out of the back yard. If the *antenna system* took a load and performed under the circumstances they describe, then both JJ and TwIT were loading the outer surface of the coax shield, and *that* was doing a major part of the radiating. Of course when one side of a 1/4 wave dipole is attached to the braid of the coax with no decoupling, then the dipole is no longer a 1/4 wave dipole! What it becomes then depends entirely on the feedline length as well as other local factors. So then it will probably take some load, and maybe even load up to full supplied power, as JJ described. At that point it's a crap shoot-you don't know *what* you've got! For sure it ISN'T a 1/4 wave dipole! But the uninformed will think their "1/4 wave dipole" worked just fine! If JJ had used a good isolation choke or 1:1 balun to decouple the coax from the 40 meter dipole at the feedpoint the tuner would have balked big time, and all that RF would have bounced around inside it, and made itself known quite loudly in the form of arcs. The 40 meter dipole does have an HF 1:1 balun at the feedpoint. The KWM-2 finals might have sparked a bit, too. Why? As far as the M-2 was concerned, it was seeing a good match, courtesy of the tuner (that is one function the tuner performs in case you didn't know). There was no arcing anywhere...have no idea what the swr was on the feedline, but that is not the point. The point is, I did get a signal out and made contacts, all with good readability on both ends. I have never claimed this would make a good antenna or that one should operate such, just proved that it can work to some extent. I thought you were smarter than dannyboy but guess not. I'll admit stupidity if you can explain how and why that antenna worked as a quater wave dipole. I already presented some fairly comprehensive data on why it wouldn't. That was pretty basic stuff. That a quarter wave dipole antenna would work is fairly extraordinary. Present your evidence and your theory/rationale. - Mike KB3EIA - Probably for the same reason loading up house plumbing will work, or loading up a coat hanger, or whatever. With a tuner, and with other apparatuses in use or not, coupling--whatever you want to call it--if a signal gets out, it gets out and that is all that counts *sometimes.* Kim W5TIT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|