Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article k.net,
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com writes: The ARRL board is in favor of retaining CW on HF. Dan/W4NTI Dan: Does that also mean they favor retaining code testing for a General or Extra class license? If so, how hard are they going to work to keep the current code testing requirement in place? If the ARRL truly supported code testing, then "Restructuring" would have come out a whole lot differently, perhaps keeping a 12-WPM test for Extra. That didn't happen, and it's because the ARRL wants code testing dropped, for the sake of (hopefully) getting more people licensed and becoming members. It is their never spoken, hidden agenda. Supporting "CW" and supporting code testing are two separate and entirely different things. 73 de Larry, K3LT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: OLD ARRL and AMECO HAM Publications, old QST's | Boatanchors | |||
Amateur Radio Newslin(tm) Report 1385 – February 27, 2004 | General | |||
FS: OLD ARRL and AMECO HAM Publications | Boatanchors | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | General | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | Policy |