LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 3rd 03, 12:53 AM
Larry Roll K3LT
 
Posts: n/a
Default ARRL you can Kiss my $39.00 a Year Good Bye

In article k.net,
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com writes:


The ARRL board is in favor of retaining CW on HF.

Dan/W4NTI


Dan:

Does that also mean they favor retaining code testing for a General or
Extra class license? If so, how hard are they going to work to keep the
current code testing requirement in place?

If the ARRL truly supported code testing, then "Restructuring" would have
come out a whole lot differently, perhaps keeping a 12-WPM test for
Extra. That didn't happen, and it's because the ARRL wants code testing
dropped, for the sake of (hopefully) getting more people licensed and
becoming members. It is their never spoken, hidden agenda.

Supporting "CW" and supporting code testing are two separate and
entirely different things.

73 de Larry, K3LT

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: OLD ARRL and AMECO HAM Publications, old QST's Al Schapira Boatanchors 0 May 28th 04 07:53 PM
Amateur Radio Newslin(tm) Report 1385 – February 27, 2004 Radionews General 0 March 4th 04 09:52 PM
FS: OLD ARRL and AMECO HAM Publications Al Schapira Boatanchors 0 January 23rd 04 09:19 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews General 0 January 18th 04 09:34 PM
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? K0HB Policy 68 August 4th 03 02:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017