Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 6th 03, 04:27 AM
Emmersom Bigguns
 
Posts: n/a
Default Comments to FCC on RM-10787 No Code Proposal

Very well done Dan!

"Dan Finn" wrote in message
...
Sorry if this is a duplicate post. Bellsouth changed news servers and I
didn't see this posted the first time:

This comment was submitted to the FCC via their ECFS website tool on
09/01/2003 in respect to RM-10787:

This is to oppose RM-10787, which proposes to eliminate the 5 wpm Morse

code
test for amateurs who which to transmit on the "HF" frequency bands (30MHz
and below). These frequencies are a precious resource and Morse code has
proven, time and again, to be the only feasible frequency mode available

1)
that can be useful during emergencies especially when band conditions are
bad 2) for communications with other amateurs in poorer countries than the
USA. Allowing access to these unique frequencies by individuals unfamiliar
with Morse code would result in a structure wherein the Morse-only

subbands
would likely be modified to allow voice. In doing so, those individuals
worldwide who wish to communicate via Morse would be deprived of usage of
the common Morse frequencies and be forced to upgrade to mode that they

may
not be able to afford, would likely require higher power levels to
communicate, especially on the 40m and 80m bands and result in either

voice
communications that are less reliable than CW or digital, which is more
expensive and not generally available in some countries that use Morse
extensively such as the Philippines, India, some parts of Russia, Africa

and
even in the case of expeditionary groups in such places as the Antarctic.
Finally, the US still needs to have a stable population of individuals who
can send and receive Morse code in times of communications emergencies and
certain military situations. The current population of such individuals

will
suffer attrition rates and almost certainly cease to exist in the future
without the current Morse code requirements for amateur operators. Usage

of
these frequencies is a great privilege and knowledge of Morse is a very
small price to pay while our Nation benefits from having a pool of

competent
Morse operators. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this

proposal.

Respectfully Submitted,

Daniel J. Finn
KR4AJ




---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 8/19/2003


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1360– September 5 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 6th 03 09:08 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1360– September 5 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 6th 03 09:08 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1360– September 5 2003 Radionews Dx 0 September 6th 03 09:08 AM
FCC taking Comments on RM-10787 Morse Code Elimination Petition Dan/W4NTI Policy 3 August 29th 03 02:44 PM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017