Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kim W5TIT" wrote in message ... "charlesb" wrote in message m... "K0HB" wrote in message news:b71720b321f483edfb53ce7de21e4078.128005@mygat e.mailgate.org... Between February 14, 1991 and July 5, 1991, the Commission granted 1,925 new Technician class licenses under the no-code provisions. A couple of guys have done research which shows that 1,880 of those licenses have not been renewed or upgraded to a higher class license and are beyond the two year grace period. That equates to a retention rate of only 2.3%. Any ideas for increasing the reenlistment rate? 73, de Hans, K0HB Drop the no-code provision of the Tech license, obviously. With a 97.7% failure rate, I'd say the new policy is a real loser. - We better drop it fast and return to what worked better in the past. I predicted something like this, but not to such a degree, when so many of the new no-code techs showed a generalized disrespect for the PART97 regs and the traditions of amateur radio. It was obvious that many of them did not care at all about the hobby. - They just wanted to know what they could get out it, what they could get away with. Many of them spent more time bashing the hobby than anything else. As you have noted, almost none of them went on to progress and advance themselves as hams. Personally, I think we will be much better off without most of those "hams", and that we should avoid policies that increase membership in this way in the future. We should do as we did in the past, emphasizing quality, not quantity of our membership. According to your figures Hans, the no-code tech deal did the hobby more harm than good. Charles, N5PVL Sigh. How 'bout this: ever consider that a lot of CBers did, indeed, hear of the new requirements (lower CW testing standards) and decide to get into ham radio for....guess what: FM!!!!!???? When I was "into" CB radio, I was barely ever on AM. There's a whole "other" gang of participants out there on CB--and the mentors of that group are mostly hams. The USB/LSB and, alas, FM--yes, illegal but done--part of CB is an area where you'll find people who are courteous, have "gentlemen's" rules that are followed; where people experiment with antenna design and construction; where an "eyeball" meeting is just as likely; etc. When I was drawn to and got my ticket, you know what the greatest relief was? Being able to turn a radio on and not hear all that hissing, heterodyning, etc.!!! FM is great and that is what I like most about ham radio. HF sucks for all the noise. So, no need/interest to upgrade. And, everyone else was as relieved and impressed with FM also. Listening to HF brings back those days when we had to deal with all that noise. And, it's not a pretty memory. Kim W5TIT Sounds like Kim need to operate a cell phone. Dan/W4NTI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
PL-259 loss rate? | Antenna | |||
Why do monitors flicker on TV? | Antenna | |||
Single Sideband FM | Homebrew | |||
Latest News - Morse Code Test May Not "Die" at ITU Conference. | Policy |