Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Issued there new De-Coder rings yet?
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Those will ship with the new Yeasucobra 2000.
It's a special package worked out between Yeasu, Cobra, Super America Truck Stops, and NCI®. They are teaming up to offer a new Super HF'er rig that fits nicely into any truck or table top. Covers the entire Ham Radio band, 11 through 160 meters. The first 1000 units ship with a nice autographed picture of Carl, the guru of modern day Ham Radio. I can hardly wait! 10-73 y'all! "WA8ULX" wrote in message ... Issued there new De-Coder rings yet? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why bother? DICK sends code so poorly that it cannot be copied.
Thats not the CODE I was talking about. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
hmmm..
a little sour over your precious CW testing being discontinued, world-wide? Clint KB5ZHT |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Clint"
rattlehead@computronDOTnet writes: hmmm.. a little sour over your precious CW testing being discontinued, world-wide? Not "sour" at all. But 8 countries (so far) is hardly "world wide". -- It will be really interesting to see what happens to ham radio in countries where code testing is totally eliminated. Will there be big increases in growth (i.e., lots of new hams)? Will there be lots of new technology brought to the ARS by new hams for whom the code test was a "barrier"? Time will tell. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Not "sour" at all. But 8 countries (so far) is hardly "world wide". hm, I see.... um, and you know the one and only acceptable definition of "world wide" huh? I guess i've missed where it's written that "world wide" is composed of no less than 9 countries. The fact is, it would only take two seperate nations to call something "multinational" or "international".. so, would it comfort you a little more if I were to have said "internationally, code testing is being dropped"? you'd also do well to make a case study of how many hams are represented by the nations that are dropping it. Many nations that aren't are composed of nations with fewer than a dozen hams.... and a few that are run by dicators (lybia) have 1 and only 1 ham operator.... guess who..... Clint KB5ZHT |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Clint"
rattlehead@computronDOTnet writes: Not "sour" at all. But 8 countries (so far) is hardly "world wide". hm, I see.... um, and you know the one and only acceptable definition of "world wide" huh? Nope. However, I find it hard to believe that anyone would reasonably call 9 countries (*so far*) would constitute "world wide" when there are many more countries yet to make a change. I guess i've missed where it's written that "world wide" is composed of no less than 9 countries. I guess i've missed where it's written that "world wide" is composed of no more than 9 countries - out of how many? The fact is, it would only take two seperate nations to call something "multinational" or "international".. so, would it comfort you a little more if I were to have said "internationally, code testing is being dropped"? Better yet - just say "So far, it's been removed in 9 countries". you'd also do well to make a case study of how many hams are represented by the nations that are dropping it. Many nations that aren't are composed of nations with fewer than a dozen hams.... and a few that are run by dicators (lybia) have 1 and only 1 ham operator.... guess who..... Then tell us - how many hams are represented by the 8 nations that are removing code testing? How many hams are there in Singapore, Switzerland, the UK, Belgium, Germany, Austria, Netherlands, Norway, and Ireland...? Here's the country to watch: Japan. They've had an HF license with no code test for decades. (It's their 4th class license). And they used to have the world's largest amateur population. But about 1995 their numbers started dropping and they continue to fall. Why? Some say it's the Japanese economy Some say it's the Internet Some say it's cheap cell phones And some say it's the code test for the other licenses. But Japan still has code testing. Maybe that will change. (Note that Japan issues separate operator and station licenses. *Operator* licenses are free and never expire, so the operator license totals never decline. *Station* licenses have to be renewed and cost money (120 yen). Station licenses are declining rapidly. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() However, I find it hard to believe that anyone would reasonably call 9 countries (*so far*) would constitute "world wide" oh, okay. So I guess you'll be the standard to which "reasonable" will be defined. Got ya. |