LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old September 24th 03, 11:42 PM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes:

Regardless of one's stance on the code, reviewing the history of the FCC
shows that they are NOT necessarily concerned with what's best for the ARS.


That's not required under the FCC's charter from the US Congress.

"What is best for the ARS" is an extremely subjective (and thus
prejudicial) viewpoint.




If they were, BPL would never have gotten as far as it has.



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How does a 6146B fail? Angel Vilaseca Boatanchors 12 March 5th 04 08:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017