| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes: Regardless of one's stance on the code, reviewing the history of the FCC shows that they are NOT necessarily concerned with what's best for the ARS. That's not required under the FCC's charter from the US Congress. "What is best for the ARS" is an extremely subjective (and thus prejudicial) viewpoint. If they were, BPL would never have gotten as far as it has. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| How does a 6146B fail? | Boatanchors | |||